stonehenge - English Heritage
stonehenge - English Heritage
stonehenge - English Heritage
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
047-120 section 2.qxd 6/21/05 4:19 PM Page 71<br />
axes of the type found widely across southern Wales,<br />
southwest England, Wessex, the Channel Islands, and<br />
northern France (especially Brittany, Normandy, and the<br />
Loire basin). An axe that is very similar, if not identical, to<br />
those produced in the Bulford mould was found at<br />
Sandleheath on the Wiltshire/Hampshire Border (Moore<br />
and Rowlands 1972, 28; and see Needham 1981). The other<br />
side of the Bulford mould has a matrix for casting a very<br />
rare kind of socketed axe which has two loops on different<br />
levels. Overall, the mould belongs within Burgess’ Ewart<br />
Park industrial phase of the later Bronze Age (Burgess 1968,<br />
17–26), a period of diversification and change. Moore and<br />
Rowlands (1972, 33) suggest that peripatetic axe-smiths<br />
working in this tradition often set up their workshops close<br />
to river-crossings, a very suitable context for the Bulford<br />
mould. It is also notable that this evidence of<br />
bronzeworking is contemporary with the large hoard of<br />
Sompting axes from Figheldean Down discussed above.<br />
IRON AGE (700 BC–AD 50)<br />
Although the Wessex region has a pre-eminent position in<br />
British Iron Age studies (Champion 2001), the period from<br />
700 BC through to the Roman Conquest is traditionally<br />
regarded as a time of relatively little activity in and around<br />
the southern part of Salisbury Plain (see Cunliffe 1973a–c<br />
for regional context). In fact, however, many of the main<br />
features of the southern British Iron Age are well<br />
represented: open settlements, enclosures, and hillforts.<br />
The full chronology and sequence of these is poorly<br />
understood, but taken with the additional evidence of wellpreserved<br />
fieldsystems and boundaries this period has<br />
considerable potential for future research. Map K shows the<br />
distribution of sites and monuments of the Iron Age.<br />
Most of the earlier ceremonial monuments so<br />
characteristic of the second and third millennia BC show<br />
very little sign of activity after about 700 BC. Nothing firmly<br />
attributable to the period has been found at Stonehenge<br />
itself, and even the numerous barrows and cemeteries of<br />
the middle and later second millennium BC seem to have<br />
been left alone. The Wilsford Shaft was almost completely<br />
infilled by about 400 BC to judge from a small group of<br />
dated material in the very upper fill (Ashbee et al. 1989,<br />
figure 64). The Stonehenge Environs Survey failed to yield a<br />
single piece of Iron Age pottery from its fieldwalking<br />
programme (Richards 1990).<br />
The best-known class of monument of the Iron Age is the<br />
hillfort, of which numerous variants have been recognized<br />
(Cunliffe 1991, 312–70). Within the Stonehenge Landscape<br />
there are two major hillforts. The largest is Ogbury<br />
overlooking the River Avon at Great Durnford. This poorly<br />
known site is a univallate enclosure of 26ha but it has never<br />
been adequately surveyed and is an obvious candidate for<br />
study. Crawford and Keiller (1928, 150–2) provide the best<br />
description and illustrate their account with a fine nearvertical<br />
aerial photograph; accounts of the site extend back<br />
to Stukeley’s visit in the early eighteenth century. Internal<br />
Illustration 48<br />
The Durnford Hoard of<br />
middle Bronze Age<br />
metalwork. [Drawings by<br />
Vanessa Constant of items<br />
in Devizes Museum<br />
(B,C,G–N) and Salisbury<br />
Museum (A, D–F).]<br />
71