07.04.2014 Views

stonehenge - English Heritage

stonehenge - English Heritage

stonehenge - English Heritage

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

047-120 section 2.qxd 6/21/05 4:19 PM Page 75<br />

Armorican tribe the Aulerci Cenomani from Lake, Wilsford<br />

(Robinson 1991, 119); and a Carthaginian bronze coin found in<br />

March 1956 north of the Boscombe to Amesbury Road.<br />

By the first century AD the Stonehenge area lay on the<br />

periphery of several major territorial units, perhaps tribal<br />

lands or small kingdoms: the Durotriges to the southwest, the<br />

Dobunni to the northwest, the Atrebates to the northeast, and<br />

the Belgae to the southeast (Illustration 53). It also lay on the<br />

boundary between the southeastern tribes which are<br />

sometimes seen as occupying a core area having close contact<br />

with the Roman world and the peripheral tribes who had much<br />

less contact and were perhaps more traditional in their social<br />

organization and lifestyles (Cunliffe 1991, figure 14.38).<br />

ROMANO-BRITISH (AD 50–450)<br />

The Roman invasion of AD 43 and the subsequent<br />

annexation of southern Britain to the Roman Empire over the<br />

ensuing decade or so have been extensively discussed with<br />

reference to central southern counties and the west country<br />

(Branigan 1973; Cunliffe 1973d; Manning 1976). The<br />

Stonehenge area lies within the lands taken during the first<br />

few years of the conquest, being well to the southeast of the<br />

Fosse Way frontier believed to have been established by AD<br />

47. Manning (1976, 19) noted, however, that in the area<br />

north of Old Sarum, across what is now Salisbury Plain, there<br />

are no known Roman forts and very little evidence for the<br />

presence of the Roman army. The reason for this is probably<br />

the peripheral position of the region relative to the centres of<br />

the surrounding tribal territories which were the focus of<br />

Roman attention (Illustration 54). Nonetheless, a substantial<br />

Romano-British settlement developed around a junction of<br />

four or five roads at Old Sarum just 5km south of the<br />

Stonehenge Landscape (see RCHM 1981, 1; James 2002) and<br />

this must naturally have influenced developments around<br />

about. Map L shows the distribution of recorded Romano-<br />

British sites and finds in the Stonehenge Landscape.<br />

Within the Stonehenge Landscape it is clear that some<br />

existing Iron Age settlements continued and perhaps<br />

expanded. This is certainly the case at Boscombe Down<br />

West where settlement drift is evident; Area P contained<br />

late Iron Age and first- to second-century AD pits while Area<br />

S saw occupation of the third and fourth centuries AD and<br />

Area R contained contemporary burials (Richardson 1951,<br />

136). Rather significant are the imported butt beakers and<br />

St Remy ware found in Area P which perhaps arrived from<br />

Gaul via Poole Harbour, and the imitation Terra Nigra<br />

platters perhaps from eastern England (Richardson 1951,<br />

149–53). Equally, at Figheldean/Netheravon, occupation of<br />

the large multi-sided enclosure beside the River Avon<br />

continued through into the second century AD with<br />

unenclosed occupation, a Roman villa, and a cemetery of<br />

the later Roman period (Graham and Newman 1993;<br />

Illustration 54<br />

Roman civitates in<br />

southern Britain.<br />

[Based on Frere 1967, 1.]<br />

75

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!