stonehenge - English Heritage
stonehenge - English Heritage
stonehenge - English Heritage
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
047-120 section 2.qxd 6/21/05 4:19 PM Page 75<br />
Armorican tribe the Aulerci Cenomani from Lake, Wilsford<br />
(Robinson 1991, 119); and a Carthaginian bronze coin found in<br />
March 1956 north of the Boscombe to Amesbury Road.<br />
By the first century AD the Stonehenge area lay on the<br />
periphery of several major territorial units, perhaps tribal<br />
lands or small kingdoms: the Durotriges to the southwest, the<br />
Dobunni to the northwest, the Atrebates to the northeast, and<br />
the Belgae to the southeast (Illustration 53). It also lay on the<br />
boundary between the southeastern tribes which are<br />
sometimes seen as occupying a core area having close contact<br />
with the Roman world and the peripheral tribes who had much<br />
less contact and were perhaps more traditional in their social<br />
organization and lifestyles (Cunliffe 1991, figure 14.38).<br />
ROMANO-BRITISH (AD 50–450)<br />
The Roman invasion of AD 43 and the subsequent<br />
annexation of southern Britain to the Roman Empire over the<br />
ensuing decade or so have been extensively discussed with<br />
reference to central southern counties and the west country<br />
(Branigan 1973; Cunliffe 1973d; Manning 1976). The<br />
Stonehenge area lies within the lands taken during the first<br />
few years of the conquest, being well to the southeast of the<br />
Fosse Way frontier believed to have been established by AD<br />
47. Manning (1976, 19) noted, however, that in the area<br />
north of Old Sarum, across what is now Salisbury Plain, there<br />
are no known Roman forts and very little evidence for the<br />
presence of the Roman army. The reason for this is probably<br />
the peripheral position of the region relative to the centres of<br />
the surrounding tribal territories which were the focus of<br />
Roman attention (Illustration 54). Nonetheless, a substantial<br />
Romano-British settlement developed around a junction of<br />
four or five roads at Old Sarum just 5km south of the<br />
Stonehenge Landscape (see RCHM 1981, 1; James 2002) and<br />
this must naturally have influenced developments around<br />
about. Map L shows the distribution of recorded Romano-<br />
British sites and finds in the Stonehenge Landscape.<br />
Within the Stonehenge Landscape it is clear that some<br />
existing Iron Age settlements continued and perhaps<br />
expanded. This is certainly the case at Boscombe Down<br />
West where settlement drift is evident; Area P contained<br />
late Iron Age and first- to second-century AD pits while Area<br />
S saw occupation of the third and fourth centuries AD and<br />
Area R contained contemporary burials (Richardson 1951,<br />
136). Rather significant are the imported butt beakers and<br />
St Remy ware found in Area P which perhaps arrived from<br />
Gaul via Poole Harbour, and the imitation Terra Nigra<br />
platters perhaps from eastern England (Richardson 1951,<br />
149–53). Equally, at Figheldean/Netheravon, occupation of<br />
the large multi-sided enclosure beside the River Avon<br />
continued through into the second century AD with<br />
unenclosed occupation, a Roman villa, and a cemetery of<br />
the later Roman period (Graham and Newman 1993;<br />
Illustration 54<br />
Roman civitates in<br />
southern Britain.<br />
[Based on Frere 1967, 1.]<br />
75