02.05.2014 Views

GCOS Implementation Plan - WMO

GCOS Implementation Plan - WMO

GCOS Implementation Plan - WMO

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Implementation</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> for the Global Observing System for Climate in Support of the UNFCCC<br />

(2010 Update)<br />

better (modern sensors offer the possibility of systematically generating global products at a spatial<br />

resolution of about 300 m).<br />

FAPAR is recovered from a range of sensors by various algorithms using the visible and infrared parts<br />

of the spectrum, and the accuracy and reliability of these products is not always properly documented.<br />

Currently available products have been shown to exhibit significant differences, which detract from<br />

their usefulness in downstream applications. The CEOS WGCV, in collaboration with <strong>GCOS</strong> and<br />

GTOS, should lead the comparison and evaluation of these FAPAR products as well as the<br />

benchmarking of the algorithms used to generate them. Reference sites making in situ observations<br />

should be fully engaged in this process, and it would be desirable if these sites were collocated with<br />

the terrestrial reference sites proposed in Action T3, provided that these sites offer a reasonable<br />

degree of spatial homogeneity over spatial scales comparable to the resolution of the sensors. WGCV<br />

is identifying a core set of sites and measurement campaigns, which should be supported by the<br />

CEOS agencies and by national research budgets.<br />

Relatively homogeneous sites, at scales comparable to the typical spatial resolution of modern<br />

sensors, are preferable, but a detailed characterisation of the spatial variability of those sites is<br />

required.<br />

Action T29 [IP-04 T29] 98<br />

Action: Establish a calibration/validation network of in situ reference sites for FAPAR and LAI and<br />

conduct systematic, comprehensive evaluation campaigns to understand and resolve differences<br />

between the products and increase their accuracy.<br />

Who: Parties’ national and regional research centres, in cooperation with space agencies coordinated<br />

by CEOS WGCV, <strong>GCOS</strong> and GTOS.<br />

Time-Frame: Network operational by 2012.<br />

Performance Indicator: Data available to analysis centres.<br />

Annual Cost Implications: 1-10M US$ (40% in non-Annex-I Parties).<br />

ECV – Leaf Area Index (LAI)<br />

LAI measures the amount of plant leaf material in an ecosystem. It is typically expressed as a nondimensional<br />

value giving the number of square metres of leaf material per square metre of ground.<br />

This variable plays important roles in models that represent processes, such as photosynthesis,<br />

respiration and rain interception, that couple vegetation to the climate system through the radiation,<br />

carbon, and water cycles. Hence, LAI appears as a key variable in many models describing<br />

vegetation-atmosphere interactions.<br />

LAI can be estimated in situ by destructive sampling or with the help of commercially available<br />

dedicated instruments. It is routinely measured at a number of research sites dealing with surface<br />

climate, ecological, or agricultural issues. CEOS WGCV is playing a coordinating role in this work.<br />

Benchmarking and consistency checking are required for the global archive of LAI measurements.<br />

For reasons set out below, in some parts of the globe (e.g., in the humid Tropics), LAI can only be<br />

measured by in situ methods. However, the measurement network is sparse in many regions of the<br />

world. It should be maintained and ideally expanded to become much more representative of the<br />

diversity of ecosystem conditions. The development and maintenance of reference sites to address<br />

this inadequacy should be addressed, as explained elsewhere in this document. Building on existing<br />

networks, such as FLUXNET, LAInet and BIGFOOT, is a possible way to improve this situation (see<br />

Action T3). The CEOS WGCV has begun to coordinate this through the creation of a centralized<br />

database, an activity that should continue.<br />

The retrieval of reliable LAI estimates from space remains difficult. When the canopy cover is sparse,<br />

reflectance measurements are dominated by soil properties, and the accuracy of the LAI is low. When<br />

LAI values exceed 3 or 4, optical measurements lose their sensitivity to changes in LAI (signal<br />

saturation. Also, since the LAI measured by satellites is usually inferred from spectral reflectances in<br />

the visible and infrared spectrum, it is de facto coupled to FAPAR estimates, even though both<br />

variables are in principle independent and play quite different roles in the climate system.<br />

Nonetheless, regular global LAI estimates from space are currently being produced, and this effort<br />

98 See Action T3.<br />

124

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!