GCOS Implementation Plan - WMO
GCOS Implementation Plan - WMO
GCOS Implementation Plan - WMO
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
<strong>Implementation</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> for the Global Observing System for Climate in Support of the UNFCCC<br />
(2010 Update)<br />
Action T39<br />
Action: Develop set of active fire and FRP products from the global suite of operational<br />
geostationary satellites.<br />
Who: Through operators of geostationary systems, via CGMS, GSICS, and GOFC-GOLD.<br />
Time-Frame: Continuous.<br />
Performance Indicator: Availability of products.<br />
Annual Cost Implications: 1-10M US$ (Mainly by Annex-I Parties).<br />
6.3. Terrestrial Domain – Data Management and Reanalysis<br />
Terrestrial Reanalysis<br />
As in other fields of science, and most prominently in the atmospheric sciences, data assimilation and<br />
reanalysis techniques have taken on a prominent role in offering a practical way to ensure the<br />
consistency between the various products that are being generated. This is achieved by explicitly<br />
taking into account the degree of uncertainty associated with models (which are always simplified<br />
representations of reality), a priori estimates, and input data (which are always observed or measured<br />
with a finite accuracy). The techniques developed by atmospheric scientists and other geophysicists<br />
are now being applied to the analysis of satellite data over land (including land interactions with the<br />
atmosphere) and permit the retrieval of products such as the components of the surface carbon cycle<br />
or albedo, in such a way that the accuracy of the resulting product is documented as part of the<br />
procedure. This approach helps determine objectively the respective contributions of both models and<br />
data, the optimal ways to improve the observing system to increase the accuracy of the results, and<br />
naturally generates products that are much easier to incorporate in larger models (e.g., climate<br />
models). In the near future, it is likely that multiple land surface products (e.g., albedo and FAPAR)<br />
will be jointly retrieved through such procedures, thereby ensuring that they are all mutually<br />
consistent. The reprocessing of existing satellite remote-sensing archives with these advanced tools<br />
should thus be encouraged, especially in the context of (or perhaps in advance of) large-scale<br />
reanalysis exercises over multiple decades. It is recommended that a review of the state of the art in<br />
land surface albedo (LSA) estimation from space measurements be made in coordination with<br />
AOPC/TOPC to begin the reanalysis of existing datasets by including the following tasks:<br />
• Benchmark existing products (continuation and extension of the initial effort to compare Meteosat,<br />
MODIS, and MISR LSA products), both in space and time, and propose ways and means to<br />
merge such products to generate truly global products with adequate coverage in Polar Regions.<br />
• Investigate the compatibility between albedo products derived from bi-directional reflectance<br />
observations acquired by sensors on geostationary and polar-orbiting platforms.<br />
• Evaluate the factors affecting the quality of LSA products and, in particular, their dependency on<br />
related atmospheric products (e.g., clouds and aerosols).<br />
• Investigate the drawbacks, limitations, and obstacles that have prevented the effective use of<br />
these albedo products in General Circulation Models (GCMs) and recommend ways to address<br />
these issues.<br />
• Promote sensitivity studies and other appropriate projects aimed at documenting the role and<br />
impact of LSA products in climate models, with a view to establishing precise requirements for the<br />
characteristics of this product.<br />
This approach could also very usefully be applied in the case of the soil moisture ECV. A number of<br />
land assimilation projects have assessed soil moisture on a global scale, such as the Global Soil<br />
Wetness Project (http://www.iges.org/gswp/). These projects have produced significant apparent<br />
differences between model outputs but show similar variations from year to year in model projections.<br />
Therefore it appears that there are systematic differences in the projections that are computer-model<br />
dependent. Reanalysis of in situ and satellite data integrated into Earth-system dynamic models<br />
could improve our understanding of soil moisture observations and model projections.<br />
129