04.05.2014 Views

Lockout / Tagout - Ohio Bureau of Workers' Compensation

Lockout / Tagout - Ohio Bureau of Workers' Compensation

Lockout / Tagout - Ohio Bureau of Workers' Compensation

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

August 21, 1995<br />

John B. Miles, Jr.<br />

Director, Directorate <strong>of</strong><br />

Compliance Programs<br />

U.S. Department <strong>of</strong> Labor<br />

Occupational Safety and Health Administration<br />

200 Constitution Avenue, NW<br />

Washington, D.C. 20210<br />

Re: 1910.147 <strong>Lockout</strong>/<strong>Tagout</strong> Regulation Interpretation<br />

Dear Mr. Miles:<br />

We recently received a copy <strong>of</strong> a memorandum from William Wiehrdt, Assistant<br />

Regional Administrator in Region V, to Mel Lischefski, Area Director in Appleton,<br />

Wisconsin, regarding OSHA's interpretation <strong>of</strong> the periodic inspection requirements<br />

contained in the <strong>Lockout</strong>/<strong>Tagout</strong> Standard, 29 CFR Sec. 1910.147(c)(6)(i) (copy <strong>of</strong><br />

memorandum attached). According to OSHA's analysis <strong>of</strong> the standard, the preamble to<br />

the lockout/tagout standard and OSHA Instruction STD 1-7.3, OSHA reached two<br />

conclusions:<br />

1. All authorized employees must be given at least annually an inspection <strong>of</strong> their<br />

hazardous energy-controlled maintenance work; and<br />

2. A sampling program which inspects the performance <strong>of</strong> selected authorized<br />

employees does not comply with the periodic inspection provisions <strong>of</strong> the lockout/tagout<br />

standard.<br />

Based on the issues discussed in that Memorandum and the conclusions made by the<br />

agency, we request further interpretation <strong>of</strong> this standard.<br />

Question: Can an employer meet the requirements <strong>of</strong> 1910.147(c)(6)(i) by conducting<br />

group meetings with all authorized employees?<br />

Sec. 1910.147(c)(6)(i) states that if lockout is used for energy control, the periodic<br />

inspection "must include a review, between the inspector and each authorized<br />

employee, <strong>of</strong> that employee's responsibilities under the energy control procedure being<br />

inspected." (emphasis added). The employer's certification <strong>of</strong> inspection must identify<br />

the machine or equipment on which the energy control procedure was being utilized, the<br />

date <strong>of</strong> the inspection, the employees included in the inspection and the person<br />

performing the inspection. According to OSHA Instruction STD 1-7.3(5)(a), the<br />

inspection must include a demonstration <strong>of</strong> the procedures and a review <strong>of</strong> the<br />

responsibilities <strong>of</strong> each authorized employee implementing the procedure. Furthermore,<br />

it states that "group meetings between the authorized employee who is performing the<br />

inspection and all authorized employees who implement the procedure would constitute<br />

compliance with this requirement."<br />

The previously mentioned OSHA memorandum, dated March 6, 1995, indicates that<br />

OSHA interprets this standard to mean that each and every authorized employee's work<br />

must be inspected at least annually by the inspector. This interpretation appears to<br />

7-12

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!