09.05.2014 Views

Characterization and control of the fiber-matrix interface in ceramic ...

Characterization and control of the fiber-matrix interface in ceramic ...

Characterization and control of the fiber-matrix interface in ceramic ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

115<br />

Analysis<br />

conversion <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>matrix</strong>-deposition process reveals that <strong>the</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> silicon layer to silicon carbide is <strong>the</strong> favored<br />

reaction (Table 10.5).<br />

The <strong>in</strong>termediate coat<strong>in</strong>g becomes <strong>the</strong> silicon<br />

source <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> deposition process, <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> silicon-conta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g species <strong>in</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> reactant methyltrichlorosilane reacts with <strong>the</strong> excess hydrogen <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

system to form various chlorosilanes.<br />

Earlier calculations have shown<br />

that a silicon-rich coat<strong>in</strong>g is favored at <strong>the</strong> given <strong>in</strong>filtration<br />

conditions (42).<br />

The result is methane <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> gas phase, <strong>and</strong> when<br />

elemental silicon is present, methane <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> gas mixture will react to<br />

form silicon carbide.<br />

This reaction may expla<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> extreme strength <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> bond<strong>in</strong>g between <strong>the</strong> <strong>matrix</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> elemental silicon precoat.<br />

Auger analysis <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> fracture surface <strong>of</strong> a specimen hav<strong>in</strong>g silicon<br />

as an <strong>in</strong>termediate layer was complicated by <strong>the</strong> smooth fracture surfaces<br />

<strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> lack <strong>of</strong> <strong>fiber</strong> pull-out.<br />

Fiber surfaces <strong>and</strong> pull-out grooves were<br />

elusive features; however, with diligent search<strong>in</strong>g, useful areas were<br />

found.<br />

The majority <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> observed surfaces <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>fiber</strong>s <strong>and</strong> pull-out<br />

grooves were rough <strong>in</strong> texture, most likely because <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> formation <strong>of</strong><br />

reaction zones at <strong>the</strong> boundary <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> subsequent <strong>in</strong>tense bond<strong>in</strong>g. High<br />

silicon concentrations were recorded for both <strong>the</strong> <strong>fiber</strong> surfaces <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

pull-out grooves (Figure 10.11).<br />

10.4.3 Carbon <strong>in</strong>terlavers<br />

Carbon coat<strong>in</strong>gs were produced by <strong>the</strong> crack<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> propylene gas at<br />

1375 K <strong>and</strong> reduced pressure.<br />

The concentration <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> propylene was<br />

varied to produce carbon coat<strong>in</strong>gs that ranged <strong>in</strong> thickness from 0.10 to<br />

0.28 pm. The thickness <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>terfacial layer was measured from <strong>the</strong><br />

weight ga<strong>in</strong>ed dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>terlayer deposition. The JEOL 733 electron

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!