Characterization and control of the fiber-matrix interface in ceramic ...
Characterization and control of the fiber-matrix interface in ceramic ...
Characterization and control of the fiber-matrix interface in ceramic ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
55<br />
The multiple-<strong>matrix</strong> fracture condition set by Eq. (17) reveals that <strong>the</strong><br />
method is I.argely dependent on <strong>the</strong> volume <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>matrix</strong>, thus on coat<strong>in</strong>g<br />
thickness. If <strong>the</strong> coat<strong>in</strong>g is too thick, s<strong>in</strong>gle fracture will occur. The<br />
critical volume fraction <strong>of</strong> <strong>fiber</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>matrix</strong> for <strong>the</strong> transition from<br />
s<strong>in</strong>gle to multiple fracture are shown schematically <strong>in</strong> Figure 7.5. The<br />
plot demonstrates that high-volume fractions <strong>of</strong> <strong>fiber</strong> are necessary far<br />
mu1 t-iple fracture; thus, th<strong>in</strong> coat<strong>in</strong>gs are necessary for this technique<br />
to be properly implemented. E’i-gure 7.6 graphically depicts <strong>the</strong> condition<br />
for multiple-<strong>matrix</strong> fracture for a coated Nicalsn <strong>in</strong>dividual filament.<br />
The <strong>in</strong>ateri-als be<strong>in</strong>g considered are brittle <strong>ceramic</strong>s I<br />
It is assumed<br />
that <strong>the</strong> <strong>fiber</strong>s <strong>and</strong> <strong>matrix</strong> will possess very limited stra<strong>in</strong> tal-erance;<br />
thiis, fracture will occur over a small range <strong>of</strong> stra<strong>in</strong>. The radial <strong>and</strong><br />
tangential. stresses <strong>in</strong>duced by <strong>the</strong> contract<strong>in</strong>g <strong>matrix</strong> as a result <strong>of</strong><br />
Poisson effects can he assumed to be negligible. The expressions for<br />
stresses <strong>and</strong> stra<strong>in</strong>s <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>matrix</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>fiber</strong> can be derived us<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong><br />
<strong>fiber</strong>-sheath model (89-92) as shown <strong>in</strong> Figure 7.7. When a s<strong>in</strong>gle<br />
conti-nuous <strong>fiber</strong> embedded <strong>in</strong> a <strong>matrix</strong> is stretched <strong>in</strong> a direction<br />
parallel to <strong>the</strong> fi.ber, tractions arise across <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>terEace as a result<br />
<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> difference <strong>in</strong> Poisson’s ratios <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>fiber</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>matrix</strong>. Assum<strong>in</strong>g<br />
<strong>the</strong> <strong>fiber</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>matrix</strong> are circularly symmetric, <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>terfacial traction<br />
is a normal stress (90) UP given by<br />
where k is <strong>the</strong> plane-stra<strong>in</strong> bulk modulus <strong>and</strong> G,<br />
is <strong>the</strong> shear modulus <strong>of</strong><br />
<strong>the</strong> <strong>matrix</strong>. The stress at <strong>the</strong> <strong><strong>in</strong>terface</strong> caused by <strong>matrix</strong> contraction is