23.05.2014 Views

William Angerer - Department of Physics and Astronomy - University ...

William Angerer - Department of Physics and Astronomy - University ...

William Angerer - Department of Physics and Astronomy - University ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

93<br />

<strong>and</strong><br />

(-1.28)<br />

Note that equation (4.26) follows from<br />

(-1.29)<br />

Step 5 - Determine the reflection coefficient at boundary a.<br />

Steps 1 - -1 determine the tangential fields at boundary a in terms <strong>of</strong> the tangential<br />

fields at boundary b. \Ve can write the transmission coefficient, T, in terms <strong>of</strong> the<br />

reflection coefficient, R. R is calculated from the boundary conditions at interface a.<br />

which are<br />

(2 x Eta) + (2 x Eo~) = (2 x E~) + (z x E~) (-1.30 )<br />

<strong>and</strong><br />

"lJ + "lJ - _ "lJ + "lJ -<br />

rLOa + rLOa - rLla + rLla ' (-1.31)<br />

Equation (-1.31) may be rewritten as<br />

(-1.32)<br />

\Ve solve equations (4.30) <strong>and</strong> (4.32) to determine Eo~'<br />

setting £:]b = £2' It is thus<br />

assumed that only a positive going wave exists in the substrate region, <strong>and</strong> therefore<br />

the tangential electric field defined at boundary b, i.e. £2 = Eib is explicitly related<br />

to the reflection coefficient.<br />

Reproduced with permission <strong>of</strong> the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!