23.05.2014 Views

William Angerer - Department of Physics and Astronomy - University ...

William Angerer - Department of Physics and Astronomy - University ...

William Angerer - Department of Physics and Astronomy - University ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

200<br />

7.3 Calculated SHG Signal from Carbon Nanoropes<br />

In this section, we present two calculations to estimate the limits or our nonlinear<br />

optical microscope as a probe <strong>of</strong> molecular systems. The first calculation uses the<br />

SHG signal upper limit from carbon nanotubes to determine the second-order hyperpolarizability<br />

<strong>of</strong> a single carbon nanotube. The second calculation determines the<br />

SHG signal from a surface film <strong>of</strong> aligned nonlinear molecules with the same area as<br />

our carbon nanotube sample. We chose p-nitrobenzoic acid (PNBA) as the nonlinear<br />

molecule in our calculation because its nonlinear optical properties have been thoroughly<br />

investigated [6]. This calculation demonstrates that SHG microscopy from a<br />

small collection <strong>of</strong> molecules is feasible.<br />

vVe calculate the ma.ximum nonlinearity <strong>of</strong> carbon nanotubes using a simple model<br />

that assumes the carbon nanotubes act as a nonlinear surface layer on the glass<br />

substrate. We assume that the carbon nanorope is composed <strong>of</strong> 100 nanotubes. We<br />

further assume that each nanotube has C sv symmetry [30] <strong>and</strong> that the dominant<br />

hyperpolarizability <strong>of</strong> each nanotube is Q~~~,<br />

i.e. the dominant hyperpolarizability is<br />

along the a.xis <strong>of</strong> the molecule. The surface second-order nonlinear susceptibility is<br />

related to the second-order hyperpolarizability by<br />

(2) 1 N ": ~ ": ~ ~ ~ (2)<br />

X.S,ijk = 4 L(z' (3)(J . ~()(k· tS)Q8-y6(n),<br />

• n=l<br />

(7.17)<br />

with N nanotubes lying in an area A. If we assume that a nanotube has equal probability<br />

<strong>of</strong> lying parallel to or anti parallel to the z a.xis, then on average there will be a<br />

Reproduced with permission <strong>of</strong> the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!