23.05.2014 Views

William Angerer - Department of Physics and Astronomy - University ...

William Angerer - Department of Physics and Astronomy - University ...

William Angerer - Department of Physics and Astronomy - University ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

47<br />

Maker fringe<br />

autocorrelation<br />

technique single beam SHG non-collinear two beam SHG<br />

advantages ease <strong>of</strong> use observe tails <strong>of</strong> pulse<br />

portability<br />

disadvantages no direct information regarding difficult to align<br />

temporal pulse shape<br />

(no frequency information)<br />

use commercial Ti:Ah03 laser systems homemade laser systems<br />

regenerative amplifiers<br />

Table 2.4: Comparison <strong>of</strong> ultrafast pulse measurement techniques. Higher order correlations,<br />

e.g. non-collinear four wave mixing, provide additional information including<br />

asymmetry in the pulse. These measurements are correspondingly more difficult to<br />

align.<br />

Table 2.-1 compares the damped Maker fringe <strong>and</strong> autocorrelation techniques for<br />

measuring ultrafast laser pulse duration. One could construct a st<strong>and</strong> alone de\'ice<br />

to measure ultrafast pulse durations by damped Maker fringes. A schematic <strong>of</strong> this<br />

device is displayed in Fig. 2.10. This device would operate in a manner described by<br />

the flow chart displayed in Fig. 2.9.<br />

Reproduced with permission <strong>of</strong> the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!