24.05.2014 Views

Chapter A - Introduction - City of Pickering

Chapter A - Introduction - City of Pickering

Chapter A - Introduction - City of Pickering

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

COMMENT<br />

MUNICIPAL COMMENTS AND RESPONSES<br />

CITY OF PICKERING – OCTOBER 22, 2012<br />

<strong>Chapter</strong> B – Water Resources<br />

TABLE 1: COMMENTS AND RESPONSES WITH REVIEW AGENCIES (EXCLUDING TRCA)<br />

RESPONSE<br />

REPORT CHAPTER<br />

AND SECTION<br />

HIGH LEVEL Comments<br />

The 2012 Duffins Creek Hydrology Update will be completed shortly. We expect that the Seaton<br />

Landowner Group (SLG) will incorporate the results and recommendations from the hydrology<br />

update. With regards to applicable stormwater management controls, specifically quantity<br />

control, based on initial results quantity control will be required for all sub-watersheds within<br />

Seaton (including un-named tributaries <strong>of</strong> the West Duffins, and Whitevale Creek). The only<br />

areas not requiring quantity control are those which drain directly to the main branch <strong>of</strong> the West<br />

Duffins Creek. Until such time as the Seaton specific quantity control requirements are made<br />

available, the SLG shall utilize the 2 to 100 post to pre level <strong>of</strong> controls as the minimum criteria.<br />

The <strong>City</strong>’s “Stormwater Management Design Guidelines” outline the design requirements for<br />

stormwater management facilities. We expect that SLG will meet the objectives and design<br />

requirements as outlined in the <strong>City</strong>’s design guide, which is consistent with Policy 11.45 <strong>of</strong><br />

Amendment 22 to the <strong>Pickering</strong> Official Plan (Seaton Conformity OPA).<br />

There are watercourses that have no current defined channel, have existing erosion issues, or<br />

are classified as gully systems. We have identified 17 watercourses <strong>of</strong> concern (Appendix C),<br />

where erosion may potentially occur, regardless <strong>of</strong> the level <strong>of</strong> stormwater management<br />

controls. We would like to work proactively with representatives from TRCA, MNR, and the SLG<br />

to address this issue.<br />

Greater coordination between the SLG and the Region relating to stormwater management is<br />

recommended. We understand that Regional infrastructure is to drain into future <strong>City</strong><br />

stormwater management facilities, as needed and where technically feasible. Therefore, the<br />

Region’s stormwater management strategy should be incorporated within a revised MESP.<br />

The results <strong>of</strong> the 2012 Duffins Creek Hydrology Update have been incorporated into <strong>Chapter</strong> B, Section B5.1. It should be noted that<br />

at time <strong>of</strong> issuance <strong>of</strong> these comments, the 2012 Duffins Creek Hydrology Update was not complete. At time <strong>of</strong> issuance <strong>of</strong> the MESPA,<br />

the 2012 Duffins Creek Hydrology Update technical analyses were complete and the <strong>City</strong> provided flows, storage and discharge<br />

recommendations for inclusion in this MESPA.<br />

The MESPA references the <strong>City</strong>’s “Stormwater Management Design Guidelines” in <strong>Chapter</strong> B Section 6.4 and in <strong>Chapter</strong> J Section<br />

2.0.<br />

Each <strong>of</strong> the 17 watercourses <strong>of</strong> concern has been reviewed and a response provided below. This has been incorporated into the<br />

MESPA in <strong>Chapter</strong> B Section 10.5.<br />

Coordination with the Region with respect to SWM facilities and Regional road drainage has been undertaken through the NFSSR<br />

design process. Each NFSSR will identify which Regional Roads will drain to which SWM facility and which roads require on-site SWM<br />

controls. This has been included in the revised Annotated Table <strong>of</strong> Contents for the NFSSRs which is presented in <strong>Chapter</strong> J,<br />

Appendix J2.<br />

<strong>Chapter</strong> B, Section<br />

B5.1<br />

<strong>Chapter</strong> B Section 6.0<br />

and <strong>Chapter</strong> J Section<br />

2.0<br />

<strong>Chapter</strong> B Section<br />

10.0<br />

<strong>Chapter</strong> J, Appendix<br />

J2<br />

Part A – General Comments<br />

COMMENT MESPA RESPONSE (December 2011) CITY RESPONSE (October 2012) RESPONSE<br />

Hydrologic Modelling<br />

A detailed review <strong>of</strong> the hydrologic modelling included in the MESP by <strong>City</strong><br />

staff and TRCA have revealed deficiencies in the overall methodology,<br />

parameters and assumptions that went into the modelling analyses and<br />

subsequent stormwater management recommendations in the MESP. Staff<br />

recommends that the Duffins Creek 2002 Model (Aquafor Beech) be updated<br />

to include the more specific information from the Seaton area utilizing the<br />

same methodology for determining the parameters (CN*, time to peak, area,<br />

subcatchments, etc.) and calibration procedure in order to recalibrate the<br />

model using eight more years <strong>of</strong> streamflow and rainfall data (from 2002 to<br />

2010).<br />

An update to the hydrologic model has been undertaken<br />

as per discussions at numerous technical meetings with<br />

TRCA and the <strong>City</strong> throughout 2011. Based on these<br />

discussions, revisions have been made to both the<br />

existing and future conditions models. Models are<br />

discussed and results presented in <strong>Chapter</strong> B5.0.<br />

The <strong>City</strong> and TRCA are currently in the process<br />

<strong>of</strong> completing the “2012 Duffins Creek<br />

Hydrology Update”, it is the <strong>City</strong>’s expectations<br />

that the Seaton Landowner Group (SLG) will<br />

adhere to the requirements and<br />

recommendations provided by that study.<br />

The results <strong>of</strong> the 2012 Duffins Creek<br />

Hydrology Update have been incorporated<br />

into <strong>Chapter</strong> B, Section B5.1.<br />

REPORT CHAPTER<br />

AND SECTION<br />

<strong>Chapter</strong> B5.1<br />

The Sernas Group Inc., Stonybrook Consulting Inc. December 2011, Revised February 2013 Master Environmental Servicing Plan - Amendment<br />

SPL Beatty, Bird and Hale Limited, Earthfx Inc. 07161 Seaton Community, <strong>City</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Pickering</strong><br />

AMEC Earth & Environmental, R.J. Burnside Appendix A7 – Page 1<br />

Amos Environment + Planning

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!