Chapter A - Introduction - City of Pickering
Chapter A - Introduction - City of Pickering
Chapter A - Introduction - City of Pickering
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
COMMENT<br />
MUNICIPAL COMMENTS AND RESPONSES<br />
CITY OF PICKERING – OCTOBER 22, 2012<br />
<strong>Chapter</strong> B – Water Resources<br />
TABLE 1: COMMENTS AND RESPONSES WITH REVIEW AGENCIES (EXCLUDING TRCA)<br />
RESPONSE<br />
REPORT CHAPTER<br />
AND SECTION<br />
HIGH LEVEL Comments<br />
The 2012 Duffins Creek Hydrology Update will be completed shortly. We expect that the Seaton<br />
Landowner Group (SLG) will incorporate the results and recommendations from the hydrology<br />
update. With regards to applicable stormwater management controls, specifically quantity<br />
control, based on initial results quantity control will be required for all sub-watersheds within<br />
Seaton (including un-named tributaries <strong>of</strong> the West Duffins, and Whitevale Creek). The only<br />
areas not requiring quantity control are those which drain directly to the main branch <strong>of</strong> the West<br />
Duffins Creek. Until such time as the Seaton specific quantity control requirements are made<br />
available, the SLG shall utilize the 2 to 100 post to pre level <strong>of</strong> controls as the minimum criteria.<br />
The <strong>City</strong>’s “Stormwater Management Design Guidelines” outline the design requirements for<br />
stormwater management facilities. We expect that SLG will meet the objectives and design<br />
requirements as outlined in the <strong>City</strong>’s design guide, which is consistent with Policy 11.45 <strong>of</strong><br />
Amendment 22 to the <strong>Pickering</strong> Official Plan (Seaton Conformity OPA).<br />
There are watercourses that have no current defined channel, have existing erosion issues, or<br />
are classified as gully systems. We have identified 17 watercourses <strong>of</strong> concern (Appendix C),<br />
where erosion may potentially occur, regardless <strong>of</strong> the level <strong>of</strong> stormwater management<br />
controls. We would like to work proactively with representatives from TRCA, MNR, and the SLG<br />
to address this issue.<br />
Greater coordination between the SLG and the Region relating to stormwater management is<br />
recommended. We understand that Regional infrastructure is to drain into future <strong>City</strong><br />
stormwater management facilities, as needed and where technically feasible. Therefore, the<br />
Region’s stormwater management strategy should be incorporated within a revised MESP.<br />
The results <strong>of</strong> the 2012 Duffins Creek Hydrology Update have been incorporated into <strong>Chapter</strong> B, Section B5.1. It should be noted that<br />
at time <strong>of</strong> issuance <strong>of</strong> these comments, the 2012 Duffins Creek Hydrology Update was not complete. At time <strong>of</strong> issuance <strong>of</strong> the MESPA,<br />
the 2012 Duffins Creek Hydrology Update technical analyses were complete and the <strong>City</strong> provided flows, storage and discharge<br />
recommendations for inclusion in this MESPA.<br />
The MESPA references the <strong>City</strong>’s “Stormwater Management Design Guidelines” in <strong>Chapter</strong> B Section 6.4 and in <strong>Chapter</strong> J Section<br />
2.0.<br />
Each <strong>of</strong> the 17 watercourses <strong>of</strong> concern has been reviewed and a response provided below. This has been incorporated into the<br />
MESPA in <strong>Chapter</strong> B Section 10.5.<br />
Coordination with the Region with respect to SWM facilities and Regional road drainage has been undertaken through the NFSSR<br />
design process. Each NFSSR will identify which Regional Roads will drain to which SWM facility and which roads require on-site SWM<br />
controls. This has been included in the revised Annotated Table <strong>of</strong> Contents for the NFSSRs which is presented in <strong>Chapter</strong> J,<br />
Appendix J2.<br />
<strong>Chapter</strong> B, Section<br />
B5.1<br />
<strong>Chapter</strong> B Section 6.0<br />
and <strong>Chapter</strong> J Section<br />
2.0<br />
<strong>Chapter</strong> B Section<br />
10.0<br />
<strong>Chapter</strong> J, Appendix<br />
J2<br />
Part A – General Comments<br />
COMMENT MESPA RESPONSE (December 2011) CITY RESPONSE (October 2012) RESPONSE<br />
Hydrologic Modelling<br />
A detailed review <strong>of</strong> the hydrologic modelling included in the MESP by <strong>City</strong><br />
staff and TRCA have revealed deficiencies in the overall methodology,<br />
parameters and assumptions that went into the modelling analyses and<br />
subsequent stormwater management recommendations in the MESP. Staff<br />
recommends that the Duffins Creek 2002 Model (Aquafor Beech) be updated<br />
to include the more specific information from the Seaton area utilizing the<br />
same methodology for determining the parameters (CN*, time to peak, area,<br />
subcatchments, etc.) and calibration procedure in order to recalibrate the<br />
model using eight more years <strong>of</strong> streamflow and rainfall data (from 2002 to<br />
2010).<br />
An update to the hydrologic model has been undertaken<br />
as per discussions at numerous technical meetings with<br />
TRCA and the <strong>City</strong> throughout 2011. Based on these<br />
discussions, revisions have been made to both the<br />
existing and future conditions models. Models are<br />
discussed and results presented in <strong>Chapter</strong> B5.0.<br />
The <strong>City</strong> and TRCA are currently in the process<br />
<strong>of</strong> completing the “2012 Duffins Creek<br />
Hydrology Update”, it is the <strong>City</strong>’s expectations<br />
that the Seaton Landowner Group (SLG) will<br />
adhere to the requirements and<br />
recommendations provided by that study.<br />
The results <strong>of</strong> the 2012 Duffins Creek<br />
Hydrology Update have been incorporated<br />
into <strong>Chapter</strong> B, Section B5.1.<br />
REPORT CHAPTER<br />
AND SECTION<br />
<strong>Chapter</strong> B5.1<br />
The Sernas Group Inc., Stonybrook Consulting Inc. December 2011, Revised February 2013 Master Environmental Servicing Plan - Amendment<br />
SPL Beatty, Bird and Hale Limited, Earthfx Inc. 07161 Seaton Community, <strong>City</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Pickering</strong><br />
AMEC Earth & Environmental, R.J. Burnside Appendix A7 – Page 1<br />
Amos Environment + Planning