Chapter A - Introduction - City of Pickering
Chapter A - Introduction - City of Pickering
Chapter A - Introduction - City of Pickering
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
COMMENT<br />
4. Section 4.0 – Phase 2 Recommendations – page G-4, last paragraph – Neighbourhood<br />
Plans were also endorsed by <strong>City</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Pickering</strong> Council on September 29, 2011, therefore,<br />
this sentence should also include that date.<br />
Appropriate revisions have been made.<br />
RESPONSE<br />
REPORT CHAPTER<br />
AND SECTION<br />
<strong>Chapter</strong> G4<br />
5. Section 5.5 – Regional Works Facilities – page G-6 – It should be noted that Durham<br />
Region Transit recently indicated that they are considering the establishment <strong>of</strong> a transit<br />
transfer station in a location along Taunton Road where, in the fullness <strong>of</strong> time, passengers<br />
will be provided a safe location to transfer between different rapid transit services (e.g. BRT<br />
or LRT) and to local transit routes. As such, it is suggested that this additional information<br />
should be added to this section. It is acknowledged that this facility need is not included in<br />
the CPDP Class EA, and that the determination <strong>of</strong> the need and requirements for this facility<br />
would be subject to a future Study/EA.<br />
Appropriate revisions have been made. <strong>Chapter</strong> G5.5<br />
<strong>Chapter</strong> I – Phasing<br />
1. As a general comment, this section needs to be corrected, in terms <strong>of</strong> dates (e.g. <strong>City</strong><br />
Council endorsement <strong>of</strong> <strong>Pickering</strong> CPDP conformity amendment, Neighbourhood Plans and<br />
Sustainable Placemaking Guidelines), and presumably should be updated to reflect the<br />
recently submitted (October 2012) version <strong>of</strong> the SSIS, which we yet to review and<br />
comment on.<br />
2. Section 2.1 – Phasing – page I-1, 1 st paragraph – This paragraph should be updated and<br />
revised to reflect that:<br />
• <strong>Pickering</strong> Council endorsed the <strong>Pickering</strong> OPA on February 7, 2011;<br />
• The private developers’ Neighbourhood Plans 16, 18 & 19 were endorsed by <strong>Pickering</strong><br />
Council on April 26, 2011;<br />
• The Province’s Neighbourhood Plans 17, 20 & 21 were endorsed by <strong>Pickering</strong> Council<br />
on September 19, 2011; and<br />
• Ontario Municipal Board decisions on planning matters related to the Seaton<br />
Community are not final or binding until such time the Lieutenant Governor in Council<br />
confirms, varies or rescinds the decision(s) <strong>of</strong> the Board (e.g. should acknowledge<br />
declaration <strong>of</strong> Provincial interest).<br />
3. Section 1.0 – Phasing – page I-2, 1 st paragraph – Did the phasing strategy also account for<br />
adequate retail/personal service opportunities, and the logical progression <strong>of</strong> a road<br />
network, and a trial and transit system? If so, it is suggested that this section describe how<br />
these matters were taken into consideration.<br />
4. Section 1.0 – Phasing – page I-2 – 1 st paragraph, last sentence – This section should make<br />
it clear that Phase 1 <strong>of</strong> the residential/mixed use lands are to be developed in conjunction<br />
with Phase 1 <strong>of</strong> the employment lands, in order to provide job opportunities at the onset <strong>of</strong><br />
residential development.<br />
5. Section 2.1 – Cost Sharing Agreement – page I-2 – The text states that the limits <strong>of</strong> the<br />
CSA are shown on Figure I1.1, however Figure I1.1 does not illustrate the CSA limits.<br />
Accordingly, Figure I1.1 should be revised to illustrate the limits <strong>of</strong> the CSA.<br />
<strong>Chapter</strong> I has been revised to reflect the CPDP conformity amendment etc. and the SSIS.<br />
The section reference does not pertain to the comments presented, it should read Section 1.0. <strong>Chapter</strong> I, Section 1.0 has been revised<br />
accordingly.<br />
Appropriate revisions have been made.<br />
Section I1.0 has been revised accordingly.<br />
Figure I2.1 has been added showing the CSA limits.<br />
<strong>Chapter</strong> I<br />
<strong>Chapter</strong> I1<br />
<strong>Chapter</strong> I1<br />
<strong>Chapter</strong> I1<br />
<strong>Chapter</strong> I2<br />
Figure I3.1<br />
6. Section 2.2 – Oversizing <strong>of</strong> Services for Adjacent Lands – page I-2 – This section states:<br />
Section I2.2 has been revised accordingly. <strong>Chapter</strong> I2.2<br />
“…all Regional wastewater and potable water systems will be oversized” to accommodate<br />
future development in the Federal lands north <strong>of</strong> Highway 7 and in Northeast <strong>Pickering</strong>.”<br />
The Sernas Group Inc., Stonybrook Consulting Inc. December 2011, Revised February 2013 Master Environmental Servicing Plan - Amendment<br />
SPL Beatty, Bird and Hale Limited, Earthfx Inc. 07161 Seaton Community, <strong>City</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Pickering</strong><br />
AMEC Earth & Environmental, R.J. Burnside Appendix A7 – Page 32<br />
Amos Environment + Planning