Child Support Enforcement - Sarpy County Nebraska
Child Support Enforcement - Sarpy County Nebraska
Child Support Enforcement - Sarpy County Nebraska
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Note: In response to a new federal definition of the term ―reasonable in cost‖ as pertains to<br />
dependent health insurance or “cash medical support”, which definition was approved in July<br />
2008 in the Federal <strong>Child</strong> <strong>Support</strong> Regulations, <strong>Nebraska</strong>‘s HHS agency secured an<br />
amendment to our laws that defines ―reasonably available‖ to equate to 3% or less of a<br />
parent‘s gross monthly income. This change is contained in LB 288, effective 9/30/2009 (see §<br />
42-369). Note: the concept of ―cash medical support‖ only applies to “IV-D” cases at this<br />
time. The Feds have a broad view of what constitutes ―cash medical support‖. It can mean<br />
something as simple as ordering a parent to share uncovered medical expenses of the minor<br />
child. This is something routinely done in all cases except where the obligated parent has a<br />
very low income. Note also that ―cash medical‖ awards cannot have the effect of putting the<br />
parent below the poverty guidelines as set forth in state and federal law.<br />
See the section on Guidelines Issues and Health Insurance in this outline for further<br />
information.<br />
State on Behalf of Dunn v. Wiegand, 2 Neb. App. 580, 512 N.W.2d 419 (1994)<br />
If action is filed on behalf of minor child by the state, the state cannot seek<br />
reimbursement by the father for medical expenses of the mother paid by the state if<br />
the child is more than 4 years of age.<br />
See also State v. Oglesby, 244 Neb. 880, 510 N.W.2d 53 (1994)<br />
―the trial court ordered judgment ‗for medical expenses incurred in relation to the<br />
pregnancy, confinement and recovery of [the mother] in the birth of [the child].‘ That<br />
part of the judgment is not based on the rights of the child, but is in relation to the<br />
rights of the child‘s mother. As such, it was barred by the applicable 4-year statute of<br />
limitations affecting the rights of the mother or the mother‘s assignee. Section 43-<br />
1411 does not extend the statute of limitations for anyone other than the minor child<br />
involved.‖<br />
Modification Issues/ Change in Circumstances/Unclean Hands<br />
(see also Guidelines, Incarceration, Removal of <strong>Child</strong>ren, Unclean Hands)<br />
Full <strong>Nebraska</strong> <strong>Child</strong> <strong>Support</strong> Guidelines:<br />
Neb. Ct. R. § 4-217 Modification. Application of the child support guidelines which would<br />
result in a variation by 10 percent or more, but not less than $25, upward or downward, of the<br />
current child support obligation, child care obligation, or health care obligation, due to financial<br />
circumstances which have lasted 3 months and can reasonably be expected to last for an<br />
additional 6 months, establishes a rebuttable presumption of a material change of circumstances.<br />
Paragraph Q amended effective Jan. 1, 1996; Paragraph Q amended effective Sept. 1, 2002.<br />
…<br />
Neb. Ct. R. § 4-219 Limitation on Increase. Under no circumstances shall there be an increase<br />
in support due from an obligor solely because of an increase in the income of the obligee.<br />
Paragraph S effective Sept. 1, 2002.<br />
Neb. Ct. R. § 4-220 Limitation on Decrease. An obligor shall not be allowed a reduction in an<br />
existing support order solely because of the birth, adoption, or acknowledgement of subsequent<br />
children of the obligor; however, a duty to provide regular support for subsequent children may<br />
be raised as a defense to an action for an upward modification of such existing support order.<br />
Paragraph T effective Sept. 1, 2002.<br />
- 117 -