23.06.2014 Views

Child Support Enforcement - Sarpy County Nebraska

Child Support Enforcement - Sarpy County Nebraska

Child Support Enforcement - Sarpy County Nebraska

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

adduce evidence of any inequity that might occur as the result of crediting those<br />

benefits to court-ordered child support.<br />

Brodrick v. Baumgarten, 19 Neb. App. 228, ___ N.W.2d ____ (Sept. 2011)<br />

Facts: parties modify their support order and indicate the new support amount is an upward<br />

deviation from the guidelines. Five months later dad files to modify support back to what the<br />

guidelines would have set it at ($0). District court finds a material change in financial<br />

circumstances despite the fact the parents‘ incomes are exactly the same.<br />

Held: No modification is warranted. Parties cannot use a prior deviation from the guidelines as<br />

THE grounds to re-modify to a support amount with no deviation when nothing else changes.<br />

A party seeking to modify a child support order must show a material change in<br />

circumstances which (1) occurred subsequent to the entry of the original decree or<br />

previous modification and (2) was not contemplated when the decree was entered.<br />

Among the factors to be considered in determining whether a material change of<br />

circumstances has occurred are (1) changes in the financial position of the parent<br />

obligated to pay support, (2) the needs of the children for whom support is paid, (3)<br />

good or bad faith motive of an obligated parent in sustaining a reduction in income,<br />

and (4) whether the change is temporary or permanent.<br />

Brooks v. Brooks, 261 Neb. 289, 622 N.W.2d 670 (2001)<br />

There is no precise mathematical formula for calculating child support when subsequent<br />

children are involved.<br />

The calculation is left to the discretion of the court as long as the court considered<br />

the obligations to both families and the income of the other parent of the subsequent<br />

children.<br />

The party requesting a deviation from the guidelines based upon an obligation to<br />

support offspring of a subsequent relationship bears the burden of providing<br />

evidence regarding the obligation, including the income of the other parent of the<br />

child or children of the subsequent relationship.<br />

Claborn v. Claborn, 267 Neb. 201, 673 N.W.2d 533 (2004)<br />

A divorce decree does not require a parent to remaining the same employment, and<br />

child support may be calculated based on actual income when a career change is<br />

made in good faith.<br />

If applicable, earning capacity may be considered in lieu of a parent‘s actual,<br />

present income and may include factors such as work history, education,<br />

occupational skills, and job opportunities.<br />

<strong>Child</strong> support may be based on a parent‘s earning capacity when a parent voluntarily<br />

leaves employment and a reduction in that parent‘s support obligation would<br />

seriously impair the needs of the children<br />

Earning capacity may be used as a basis for an initial determination of child support<br />

under the <strong>Nebraska</strong> <strong>Child</strong> <strong>Support</strong> Guidelines where evidence is presented that the<br />

parent is capable of realizing such capacity through reasonable effort.<br />

Crawford v. Crawford, 263 Neb. 37, 263 Neb. 37 (2002)<br />

Modification of a dissolution decree and the amount of child support are matters<br />

entrusted to the trial court‘s discretion, and although the issue on appeal is reviewed<br />

de novo on the record, the decision of the trial court will be affirmed absent an<br />

abuse of discretion<br />

- 121 -

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!