Child Support Enforcement - Sarpy County Nebraska

month by said clerk in cases in which court-ordered support is delinquent in an amount equal
to the support due and payable for a one-month period of time, the obligor shall be subject to
income withholding and may be required to appear in court and show cause why such
payment was not made. In the event the obligor fails to pay and appear as ordered, a warrant
shall be issued for his or her arrest.
(3) If, regardless of whether payments are in arrears, the court orders income withholding
pursuant to Neb. Rev. Stat. § 43-1718.01 or § 43-1718.02, the statement specified in § 6-
1504(D)(2) shall be altered to read as follows:
In the event the obligor fails to pay any child, spousal support, or medical payment, as such
failure is certified each month by the district court clerk in cases in which court-ordered
support is delinquent in an amount equal to the support due and payable for a one-month
period of time, the obligor may be required to appear in court and show cause why such
payment was not made. In the event the obligor (respondent or petitioner) fails to pay and
appear as ordered, a warrant shall be issued for his or her arrest.
(E) Any order for support presented to the court shall require the obligor to furnish to the clerk
of the court his or her address, telephone number, social security number, the name of his or her
employer, and the name of his or her health insurance carrier, if any, together with the number of
the policy and the address at which claims are to be submitted. The order shall further require the
obligor to advise the clerk of any changes in such information until the judgment has been fully
paid. If both parents are parties to the action, such order shall provide that each be required to
furnish to the clerk of the court whether he or she has access to employer-related health
insurance coverage and, if so, the health insurance policy information.
(F) A worksheet showing calculations under the Nebraska Child Support Guidelines shall be
attached to every child support application, order, or decree and shall be prepared by the party
requesting child support, except that in a contested matter the worksheet shall be prepared by the
court and attached to the order or decree.
Rule 4(D)(2) and (3) amended April 17, 1996; Rule 4(F) amended January 3, 1997; Rule 4 amended May 19, 2004;
Rule 4(D) deleted and (4)(E)-(G) renumbered to (4)(D)-(F)). Renumbered and codified as § 6-1504, effective July
18, 2008.
Belitz v. Belitz, 17 Neb. App. 53, 756 N.W.2d (2008)
Oh what a tangled web a court weaves, when it seeks to please unpleasant people…
The trial court in a protracted, messy divorce attempted to extend the appeal time for one of
its earlier orders by incorporating terms of the 6 week old order into a later order, then stating
that the new order only became effective 14 days after it was signed. Only the 14 day delay
was disapproved by the Court of Appeals.
This case includes an excellent summary of other similar and dissimilar cases determining
just what constitutes a “final order” for purposes of appeal. See also the Appellate Practice
section of this outline for additional discussion.
There is no more fundamental jurisdictional precept than the doctrine that appeals
can only be taken from final orders.
Citing Huffman v. Huffman, 236 Neb. 101, 459 N.W.2d 215 (1990)…
Generally, when multiple issues are presented to a trial court for simultaneous
disposition in the same proceeding and the court decides some of the issues,
while reserving some issue or issues for later determination, the court‘s
determination of less than all the issues is an interlocutory order and is not
a final order for the purpose of an appeal.
The trial‘s court attempted 14-day extension of the time in which to appeal was error
as a matter of law and is of no force and effect on the question of whether this court
has appellate jurisdiction.
- 23 -