23.06.2014 Views

Child Support Enforcement - Sarpy County Nebraska

Child Support Enforcement - Sarpy County Nebraska

Child Support Enforcement - Sarpy County Nebraska

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

9, of the <strong>Nebraska</strong> Constitution, both of which prohibit the infliction of ―cruel and<br />

unusual‖ punishment.<br />

―To abandon one‘s children to a life of poverty and reliance upon public charity is a<br />

heinous and ignoble offense and is to be treated as such.‖<br />

We do not think the allowance for the support of defendant‘s minor child bears any<br />

resemblance whatever to a debt, and therefore the constitution does not forbid<br />

imprisonment for the defendant‘s refusal to obey the order of the court. (citing<br />

Fussell v. State, 102 Neb. 117, 166 N.W. 197 (1918))<br />

State v. Yelli, 247 Neb. 785, 530 N.W.2d 250 (1995)<br />

This case reminds us of the clear distinction between the standards of proof in civil vs.<br />

criminal cases. The burden of establishing a paternity judgment is lower than for that of<br />

establishing elements of a criminal conviction. Don’t assume you can prove paternity in a<br />

criminal case by introducing the record of the paternity judgment.<br />

Both federal and state due process dictate that an indigent defendant in a stateassisted<br />

civil paternity action has the right to the services of appointed counsel.<br />

Where a record is silent as to a defendant‘s opportunity for counsel, an appellate<br />

court may not presume that such rights were respected.<br />

A mother‘s testimony that one is the father of her child is sufficient only if she be<br />

corroborated as to material facts and circumstances which tend to support her<br />

testimony and from which, together with her testimony as to the principal act, the<br />

inference of paternity may be drawn.<br />

The burden in a criminal proceeding is to produce proof beyond a reasonable doubt<br />

of every element of a charged offense. The doctrines of res judicata and collateral<br />

estoppel are not applicable when the burden of persuasion is different in the<br />

subsequent proceeding.<br />

See also <strong>Nebraska</strong> v. Bright, 238 Neb. 348, 470 N.W.2d 181 (1991)<br />

(Quite) a bit about Custody & Visitation<br />

(See also <strong>Child</strong> <strong>Support</strong> Guidelines)<br />

§ 42-358. Attorney for minor child; appointment; powers; child or spousal support;<br />

records; income withholding; contempt proceedings; fees; evidence; appeal.<br />

(b) The court may appoint an attorney to protect the interests<br />

of any minor children of the parties. Such attorney shall be<br />

empowered to make independent investigations and to<br />

cause witnesses to appear and testify on matters pertinent<br />

to the welfare of the children. The court shall by order fix<br />

the fee, including disbursements, for such attorney, which<br />

amount shall be taxed as costs and paid by the parties as<br />

ordered. If the court finds that the party responsible is<br />

indigent, the court may order the county to pay the costs.<br />

…<br />

Annotations:<br />

From June 1, 1998, forward, when appointing a guardian ad litem or an attorney to represent the interests<br />

of the minor pursuant to this section in forums other than the juvenile court, the appointing court, in the<br />

order making the appointment, shall specify whether the person appointed is to act as a guardian ad litem<br />

- 43 -

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!