Child Support Enforcement - Sarpy County Nebraska
Child Support Enforcement - Sarpy County Nebraska
Child Support Enforcement - Sarpy County Nebraska
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
(Reviewing) a 3-year average (income) tends to be the most common approach in<br />
cases where a parent‘s income tends to fluctuate. It is not necessary for a court to<br />
look back more than three years.<br />
Henderson v. Henderson, 264 Neb. 916, 653 N.W.2d 226 (2002)<br />
The <strong>Nebraska</strong> <strong>Child</strong> <strong>Support</strong> Guidelines provide that in calculating the amount of<br />
support to be paid, a court must consider the total monthly income, defined as the<br />
income of both parties derived from all sources, except all means-tested public<br />
assistance benefits. Social Security disability insurance program benefits are not<br />
means-tested public assistance benefits, but are based on prior earnings of the<br />
recipient, not on the financial need of the recipient.<br />
Mehne v. Hess, 4 Neb. App 935, 553 N.W.2d 482 (1996)<br />
Entire net mount received from personal injury settlement award constitutes income<br />
for child support purposes<br />
Simpson v. Simpson, 275 Neb. 152, 744 N.W.2d 710 (2008)<br />
Paragraph D [now § 4-204] of the <strong>Nebraska</strong> <strong>Child</strong> <strong>Support</strong> Guidelines defines total<br />
monthly income as income ―derived from all sources, except all means-tested public<br />
assistance benefits which includes any earned income tax credit and payments<br />
received for children of prior marriages.‖ The guidelines are very specific — all<br />
income from all sources is to be included except for those incomes specifically<br />
excluded. Not excluded under the guidelines is compensation meant to offset a<br />
spouse‘s increased cost of living while residing in a different locale. We conclude,<br />
therefore, that … expatriate compensation is income for purposes of support<br />
calculations.<br />
But…<br />
Under the facts of this case, we cannot say that the district court abused its<br />
discretion when it determined that Robert‘s expatriate compensation is not<br />
reasonably available for child support payments.<br />
State o/b/o Joseph F. v. Rial, 251 Neb. 1, 554 N.W.2d 769 (1996)<br />
It is appropriate to consider overtime wages in setting child support if the overtime<br />
is a regular part of the employment and the employee can actually expect to<br />
regularly earn a certain amount of income for working overtime.<br />
Stuczynski v. Stuczynski, 238 Neb. 368, 471 N.W.2d 122 (1991)<br />
A party obligated to furnish child support is not required to undertake two separate<br />
employments when the party has one full-time job. A spouse with a full-time job,<br />
which job also furnishes substantial overtime,<br />
may not be required to work at a second job to<br />
furnish child support.<br />
Deviations are permissible under circumstances<br />
enumerated in the guidelines, including,<br />
―whenever the application of the guidelines in<br />
an individual case would be unjust or<br />
inappropriate.‖ <strong>Nebraska</strong> <strong>Child</strong> <strong>Support</strong><br />
Guidelines, § 4-203 (E).<br />
speculative income that the husband employee<br />
- 90 -