23.06.2014 Views

Child Support Enforcement - Sarpy County Nebraska

Child Support Enforcement - Sarpy County Nebraska

Child Support Enforcement - Sarpy County Nebraska

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

(Reviewing) a 3-year average (income) tends to be the most common approach in<br />

cases where a parent‘s income tends to fluctuate. It is not necessary for a court to<br />

look back more than three years.<br />

Henderson v. Henderson, 264 Neb. 916, 653 N.W.2d 226 (2002)<br />

The <strong>Nebraska</strong> <strong>Child</strong> <strong>Support</strong> Guidelines provide that in calculating the amount of<br />

support to be paid, a court must consider the total monthly income, defined as the<br />

income of both parties derived from all sources, except all means-tested public<br />

assistance benefits. Social Security disability insurance program benefits are not<br />

means-tested public assistance benefits, but are based on prior earnings of the<br />

recipient, not on the financial need of the recipient.<br />

Mehne v. Hess, 4 Neb. App 935, 553 N.W.2d 482 (1996)<br />

Entire net mount received from personal injury settlement award constitutes income<br />

for child support purposes<br />

Simpson v. Simpson, 275 Neb. 152, 744 N.W.2d 710 (2008)<br />

Paragraph D [now § 4-204] of the <strong>Nebraska</strong> <strong>Child</strong> <strong>Support</strong> Guidelines defines total<br />

monthly income as income ―derived from all sources, except all means-tested public<br />

assistance benefits which includes any earned income tax credit and payments<br />

received for children of prior marriages.‖ The guidelines are very specific — all<br />

income from all sources is to be included except for those incomes specifically<br />

excluded. Not excluded under the guidelines is compensation meant to offset a<br />

spouse‘s increased cost of living while residing in a different locale. We conclude,<br />

therefore, that … expatriate compensation is income for purposes of support<br />

calculations.<br />

But…<br />

Under the facts of this case, we cannot say that the district court abused its<br />

discretion when it determined that Robert‘s expatriate compensation is not<br />

reasonably available for child support payments.<br />

State o/b/o Joseph F. v. Rial, 251 Neb. 1, 554 N.W.2d 769 (1996)<br />

It is appropriate to consider overtime wages in setting child support if the overtime<br />

is a regular part of the employment and the employee can actually expect to<br />

regularly earn a certain amount of income for working overtime.<br />

Stuczynski v. Stuczynski, 238 Neb. 368, 471 N.W.2d 122 (1991)<br />

A party obligated to furnish child support is not required to undertake two separate<br />

employments when the party has one full-time job. A spouse with a full-time job,<br />

which job also furnishes substantial overtime,<br />

may not be required to work at a second job to<br />

furnish child support.<br />

Deviations are permissible under circumstances<br />

enumerated in the guidelines, including,<br />

―whenever the application of the guidelines in<br />

an individual case would be unjust or<br />

inappropriate.‖ <strong>Nebraska</strong> <strong>Child</strong> <strong>Support</strong><br />

Guidelines, § 4-203 (E).<br />

speculative income that the husband employee<br />

- 90 -

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!