23.06.2014 Views

Child Support Enforcement - Sarpy County Nebraska

Child Support Enforcement - Sarpy County Nebraska

Child Support Enforcement - Sarpy County Nebraska

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

otherwise provided in sections 25-2301 to 25-2310, 29-2306, and 48-641, by depositing with the<br />

clerk of the district court the docket fee required by section 33-103.<br />

(2) A notice of appeal or docket fee filed or deposited after the announcement of a decision or<br />

final order but before the entry of the judgment, decree, or final order shall be treated as filed or<br />

deposited after the entry of the judgment, decree, or final order and on the date of entry.<br />

…<br />

§ 43-1613. Findings and recommendations; exceptions; review by district court.<br />

In any and all cases referred to a child support referee by the district court, the parties shall have<br />

the right to take exceptions to the findings and recommendations made by the referee and to have<br />

a further hearing before the district court for final disposition. The district court upon receipt of<br />

the findings, recommendations, and exceptions shall review the child support referee’s report and<br />

may accept or reject all or any part of the report and enter judgment based on the district court’s<br />

own determination.<br />

Source: Laws 1989, LB 265, § 6<br />

See also: §25-1916. Appeal; supersedeas; cash or bond; effect; undertakings; amount,<br />

terms, and conditions; effect of having corporate surety.<br />

ADT Security Servs. V. A/C Security Systems, 15 Neb. App. 666 (2007)<br />

To determine the appropriate standard of review for [an] appeal, it is necessary to<br />

determine whether a claim or a counterclaim is an action at law or an action<br />

sounding in equity.<br />

The nature of an action, whether legal or equitable, is determinable from its main<br />

object, as disclosed by the averments of the pleadings and the relief sought.<br />

Although in many contexts the traditional distinctions between law and equity have<br />

been abolished, whether an action is one in equity or one at law controls in<br />

determining an appellate court‟s scope of review.<br />

An appellate court reviews a claim or counterclaim that sounds in equity de novo on<br />

the record, subject to the rule that where credible evidence is in conflict on material<br />

issues of fact, the appellate court considers and may give weight to the fact that the<br />

trial court observed the witnesses and accepted one version of the facts over<br />

another. … The appellate court does not reweigh the evidence but considers the<br />

judgment in a light most favorable to the successful party and resolves evidentiary<br />

conflicts in favor of the successful party, who is entitled to every reasonable<br />

inference deducible from the evidence.<br />

Currie v. Chief School Bus Serv., 250 Neb. 872, 553 N.W.2d 469 (1996),<br />

Although an extrajurisdictional act of a lower court cannot vest an appellate court<br />

with jurisdiction to review the merits of an appeal, the appellate court has jurisdiction<br />

and, moreover, the duty to determine whether the lower court had the power, that is,<br />

the subject matter jurisdiction, to enter the judgment or other final order sought to be<br />

reviewed.<br />

Drew on Behalf of Reed v. Reed, 16 Neb. App. 905, 755 N.W.2d 420 (2008)<br />

While a paternity action is one at law, the award of child support in such an<br />

action is equitable in nature.<br />

- 9 -

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!