23.06.2014 Views

Child Support Enforcement - Sarpy County Nebraska

Child Support Enforcement - Sarpy County Nebraska

Child Support Enforcement - Sarpy County Nebraska

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Ward v. Ward, 7 Neb. App. 821, 585 N.W.2d 551 (1998)<br />

Holding: Trial court may deduct value of child’s social security benefits adoptive Dad received<br />

for the benefit of the adopted child (on behalf of the child's deceased mother) when calculating<br />

the noncustodial parent’s child support obligation, if it is done correctly. Ruling is limited to its<br />

facts by Gress v. Gress, 274 Neb. 686, 743 N.W.2d 67 (2007),which dealt with a handicapped<br />

child. (<strong>Child</strong> in Ward had no special needs requiring an upward deviation in child support)<br />

A representative payee has a responsibility to use Social Security payments he or<br />

she receives for a child only for the use and benefit of the beneficiary in a manner<br />

and for the purposes he or she determines, under the federal guidelines.<br />

For the purposes of determining child support, Social Security payments to a<br />

representative payee for a child are for the use and benefit of the beneficiary if used<br />

for the beneficiary's current maintenance, which includes the cost of food, shelter,<br />

clothing, medical care, and personal comfort items.<br />

A judge may not satisfy his or her duty to act equitably toward all concerned, i.e., the<br />

parties and the children, by blindly following suggested child support guidelines.<br />

(citing Brandt v. Brandt, 227 Neb. 325, 417 N.W.2d 339 (1988))<br />

A court may deviate from the <strong>Nebraska</strong> <strong>Child</strong> <strong>Support</strong> Guidelines whenever the<br />

application of the guidelines in an individual case would be unjust or inappropriate.<br />

It is simply not fair or reasonable to give the custodial parent the benefit of 100% of<br />

the Social Security payments and thus shift most of the burden of supplying the<br />

unprovided support to the noncustodial parent. The guidelines can still be used as a<br />

reliable guide in setting support if the Social Security benefits are considered as<br />

family income but not attributed to either parent, and if they are applied to the<br />

support computed under the guidelines for that income, with the balance prorated to<br />

the parties on the basis of their real incomes. In this way, the total support is<br />

increased in recognition that the family income is greater than the net monthly<br />

earnings of the parents, and the parent who has the legal obligation to support the<br />

child receives the benefit of the government program intended to pay for the support<br />

of the child.<br />

Calculate support this way:<br />

1. Mom’s gross income + Dad’s Gross income = Parental gross income<br />

2. Add value of social security benefits. Sum = New family gross income<br />

3. Calculate family child support amount based on line 2.<br />

4. Deduct social security benefit amount from figure derived from step 3.<br />

5. Arrive at new family support amount.<br />

6. Prorate child support amount from step 5 between the parents based upon their “real” incomes.<br />

Spousal <strong>Support</strong>/Alimony<br />

(See also Modification)<br />

Section 43-1715. Spousal support, defined.<br />

Spousal support shall mean alimony or maintenance support for a spouse or former spouse if the<br />

provision for support is a part of an order, decree, or judgment which provides for child support<br />

and the child and spouse or former spouse are living in the same household.<br />

Source: Laws 1985, Second Spec. Sess., LB 7, § 35<br />

- 163 -

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!