Child Support Enforcement - Sarpy County Nebraska
Child Support Enforcement - Sarpy County Nebraska
Child Support Enforcement - Sarpy County Nebraska
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
State ex rel. Lemon v. Gale, 272 Neb. 295, 721 N.W.2d 347 (2006)<br />
In order to be considered by an appellate court, an alleged error must be both<br />
specifically assigned and specifically argued in the brief of the party asserting the<br />
error.<br />
J & H Swine v. Hartington Concrete*, 12 Neb. App. 885, 687 N.W.2d 9 (2004)<br />
Rule: Timing is everything. This case, if anything, may teach the necessity for patience.<br />
For an appellate court to acquire jurisdiction of an appeal, there must be a final<br />
order entered by the court from which the appeal is taken; conversely, an appellate<br />
court is without jurisdiction to entertain appeals from nonfinal orders.<br />
A notice of appeal filed before the trial court announced a ―decision or final order‖<br />
within the meaning of Neb. Rev. Stat. § 25-1912(2) (Cum. Supp. 2002) in final<br />
determination of an issue of costs cannot relate forward.<br />
An award of costs in a judgment is considered a part of the judgment.<br />
The failure of a trial court to rule on a motion for costs in its judgment leaves a<br />
portion of the judgment unresolved, and consequently, an order entering such<br />
judgment is not final for the purpose of appeal.<br />
*See also the Civil Procedure section of this outline<br />
Smeal Fire Apparatus Co. v. Kreikemeier (Smeal II), 279 Neb. 661, ___ N.W.2d<br />
___(2010)<br />
You might say that the fire truck has upset the apple cart. The Supreme Court<br />
uses this opinion to reverse course and overturn an entire series of earlier<br />
court opinions relating to civil contempt of court as well as the burden of proof<br />
needed to sustain a finding of civil contempt.<br />
Although there is no graceful way of retreating from this<br />
court‟s previous rulings, some of our troubling contempt<br />
cases have created needless difficulties at both the trial and the appellate<br />
levels. An untangling of the snarls was long overdue. Our decision changes<br />
the legal landscape of our present contempt law. We overrule a long line of<br />
cases affecting a trial court‟s jurisdiction, an appellate court‟s jurisdiction, and<br />
the standard of proof in civil contempt cases.<br />
1. May a contemnor appeal a civil contempt order from a separate postjudgment<br />
proceeding? Yes.<br />
2. We hold that in a civil contempt proceeding, a district court has inherent power to<br />
order compensatory relief when a contemnor has violated its order or judgment. We<br />
further hold that whether a contempt sanction is civil or criminal is relevant only<br />
when a party appeals from an interlocutory order of contempt. An interlocutory<br />
contempt order is an order that a court issues during an ongoing proceeding before<br />
the final judgment in the main action.<br />
- 11 -