Proceedings - Translation Concepts

MuTra 2005 – Challenges of Multidimensional Translation: Conference Proceedings
Mira Kadric
Teamwork with other participants was:
Percent
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
90.8
8.5
very good average not good
Diagram 7:
Results of question ‘Teamwork with other participants’
As in the “theoretical” part of the questionnaire, the last question of this part also asked
the participants to give an overall evaluation of the exercises. The participants had to rate the
exercises according to the following grading scale: 1 = excellent, 2 = very good, 3 = good, 4 =
satisfactory, 5 = not satisfactory. Diagram 8 shows the results.
The comparison of the individual seminars shows that the course participants were
somewhat less satisfied with the first two seminars not only regarding the theory but also with
regard to the exercises. Tab. 2 shows the results of the analysis in detail. There are grounds
for supposing that, in this case as well, the reason for this gradual improvement in the
participants’ assessment is that, after having gained experience in the first seminars, the
trainer could make appropriate improvements in the later seminars.
Overall evaluation of the exercises
80
70
60
Percent
50
40
30
20
10
0
66.9
25.4
6.9
excellent very good good satisfactory
Diagram 8:
Overall evaluation of the exercises
184