abu-bakr-naji-the-management-of-savagery-the-most-critical-stage-through-which-the-umma-will-pass

meaning the harmful things which are believed to be the results of the jihad, which are in
reality from the actions of the criminals and the duty of jihad is in no way to be blamed.
— As for the peace movements, their abandonment of jihad and their inciting of the Umma
to abandon jihad is one of the most important reasons for the descent of the punishment of
God upon the Umma, whether by giving some of us power over others – on account of the
non-victory of the religion—or by giving power to the enemies of God and sending them
against us or something else from among the disasters which God sends down, such as
earthquakes and the like.
It is strange that these peaceful Islamic movements scorn putting their hands in the hands of
the people of tawhid and jihad. They point to their [the people of jihad’s] war and their
extermination as proof that they are the cause of death for the Umma—as they claimed—
while they have no qualms about putting their hands in those of the sects, factions, political
parties, and Christians who commit the most abominable and vile massacres. They know
that those people consider those who commit massacres as nationalist heroes (!)
[105]
in their history, "al-Mujid”, whether they were a party or a state. These Islamic movements
have no qualms about uniting with, living with, conversing with, meeting with, and
exchanging smiles with anyone who shed the blood of Muslims, 29 while they do the opposite
29 When the jihad was ignited in Egypt in the beginning of the 90s of the previous century, the
Brethren joined with Shenuda, leader of the Orthodox sect, the largest of the Christian sects in Egypt, who
had previously recorded tapes distributed among the Christians in which he flagrantly cursed the
Messenger (peace and blessings be upon him). And it was proven that in the 70s he used to gather weapons
and direct conspiracies, like what happened in al-Zawiya al-Hamra’ and what followed. Likewise, before
meeting with the Brethren directly, he plainly spoke evil of our religion, ridiculing some of the laws of the
sharia which decree “not giving allegiance to a nonbeliever". He also maintained that it is impossible to
apply the sharia in Egypt on account of his rejection of that law, so that the Christians would not become
second-class citizens. I say that the Brethren joined with this criminal in order to condemn terrorism.