06.11.2014 Views

Waterway Panorama - Antaq

Waterway Panorama - Antaq

Waterway Panorama - Antaq

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Fertilizers<br />

Prior to the world crisis (September 2008),<br />

importers of fertilizers had accumulated<br />

large stocks, as prices were rising, given<br />

the warming of the global economy and favorable<br />

prices of agricultural commodities. However,<br />

with the start of the crisis, companies in possession<br />

of these stocks failed to pass on these products<br />

to farmers, and thus had large losses, reducing<br />

imports.<br />

The port of Paranaguá (PR) handled<br />

2,429,692 tonnes of fertilizer between July 2008<br />

and June 2009, representing a decrease of<br />

48.8% over the previous period. Still it led the<br />

ranking of public ports, handling more than any<br />

of the terminals. The second position was occupied<br />

by the port of Rio Grande (RS), with<br />

978,057 tonnes, representing a decrease of<br />

22.7% over the previous period. The third one<br />

was the port of Aratu (BA), which handled<br />

514,881 tonnes of fertilizer, with a decrease of<br />

33.1% over the period between July 2007 and<br />

June 2008.<br />

Among terminals, the Yara Fertilizantes terminal<br />

led the ranking, handling 1,775,873<br />

tonnes, with a decrease of 51.2% in relation to<br />

the period between July 2007 and June 2008.<br />

The second position was occupied by the PT Fospar<br />

in Paranaguá, with 1,564,945 tonnes, representing<br />

a decrease of 33.9% over the previous<br />

period. In third, TMG Santos (SP) handled<br />

719,185 tonnes, with a decrease of 47%.<br />

The port of São Francisco do Sul (SC) had the<br />

best performance in the average sheet by handling<br />

11,292 tonnes of fertilizer between July<br />

2008 and June 2009, in an average 185.6%<br />

higher than the one reported between July 2007<br />

and June 2008. The second position was occupied<br />

by the port of Salvador, with 6,014 tonnes<br />

per day (202% more than in the previous period),<br />

and the third position was occupied by the Multiple<br />

Use (public) terminal of the port of<br />

Paranaguá, with 5678 tonnes per day (13.2%<br />

more than in the previous period).<br />

The sea terminal Inácio Barbosa, managed by<br />

Vale, in Sergipe, reported an average of 9,748<br />

tonnes of fertilizer handled per day, leading the<br />

ranking in the terminal segment, ahead of the PT<br />

Fospar, which reported an average of 8,787<br />

tonnes per day. The third position was occupied<br />

by TMG, in Santos (SP), which handled 6,091<br />

tonnes per day, with a decrease of 14.5% in relation<br />

to the average reported between July 2007<br />

and June 2008.<br />

Navegantes Pier in Porto Alegre had the lowest<br />

delay time among public piers, with an average<br />

of less than one hour, followed by the Port of<br />

Pelotas, with an average time of 2 hours and Recife,<br />

with an average of 11 hours for docking.<br />

Among terminals, Serra Morena, in Porto Alegre,<br />

and the PT Oleoplan reported an average<br />

delay time of less than 1 hour, whereas vessels<br />

took 61 hours to dock, on average, in the Yara<br />

Fertilizantes terminal and up to 73 hours in the<br />

PT Fospar in Paranaguá (PR).<br />

The lowest price for port services charged<br />

per tonne of fertilizer among public ports in<br />

2008 was R$11.30, an amount charged by<br />

the port of Santos (SP), 18.2% lower than the<br />

price charged by the port of Rio Grande (RS), in<br />

the second position, and 70.4% lower than the<br />

price charged by the Port of Aratu (BA), the<br />

highest price. Among terminals, the lowest<br />

price was charged by the Yara Fertilizantes terminal,<br />

at R$8.49, 20.3% lower than the price<br />

charged by the Tefer/TMG terminal in Santos,<br />

in the second position, and 56.6% lower that<br />

the Fospar terminal in Paranaguá (PR), which<br />

had the highest price.<br />

25

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!