17.11.2014 Views

Fructose

Fructose

Fructose

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

gave up on attempts to widen the uses of Olestra, and even sold off their Cincinnati-based Olestra<br />

factory to Twin Rivers Technologies in February 2002.<br />

The FDA removed the warning requirement in 2003 as it had "conducted a scientific review of<br />

several post-market studies submitted by P&G, as well as adverse event reports submitted by<br />

P&G and the Center for Science in the Public Interest (a particularly outspoken critic). The FDA<br />

concluded that the label statement was no longer warranted", in spite of having received over<br />

20,000 complaints. When removing the Olestra warning label, the FDA cited a 6-week Procter &<br />

Gamble (makers of Olestra) study of more than 3000 people showing that an Olestra-eating group<br />

experienced only a small increase in bowel movement frequency.<br />

P&G also worked hard in its publicity campaigns to highlight the positives of the additive, even<br />

working directly with the health-care community. But, outside of the popular culture disapproval of<br />

the product, many consumers simply did not see the speedy results for which they had hoped from<br />

a product they saw as being a cure-all. This was because Olestra only addressed the fat component<br />

of the overall dietary pattern of Americans. Foods containing olestra do not contain calories from<br />

fats and many Americans believed that they could just eat more of them to compensate for the<br />

fat calories "saved". Eating olestra chips was not a particularly effective way to improve one's diet<br />

overall.<br />

Olestra is banned in many countries, including the United Kingdom and Canada<br />

6. Fluoride (Water Fluoridation)<br />

may present unreasonable health risks, particularly among children, at levels routinely added<br />

to tap water in American cities.” - ENVIRONMENTAL WORKING GROUP, July 2005<br />

"I am quite convinced that water fluoridation, in a not-too-distant future, will be consigned to<br />

medical history." - Dr. ARVID CARLSSON, Winner, Nobel Prize for Medicine (2000).<br />

Water fluoridation is the controlled addition of fluoride to a public water supply to allegedly reduce<br />

tooth decay. Fluoridated water has fluoride at a level that is effective for preventing cavities; this<br />

can occur naturally or by adding fluoride. Fluoridated water operates on tooth surfaces: in the<br />

mouth it creates low levels of fluoride in saliva, which reduces the rate at which tooth enamel<br />

demineralizes and increases the rate at which it remineralizes in the early stages of cavities.<br />

Typically a fluoridated compound is added to drinking water, a process that in the U.S. costs an<br />

average of about $0.94 per person-year. Defluoridation is needed when the naturally occurring<br />

fluoride level exceeds recommended limits. A 1994 World Health Organization expert committee<br />

suggested a level of fluoride from 0.5 to 1.0 mg/L (milligrams per liter), depending on climate.<br />

Bottled water typically has unknown fluoride levels, and some domestic water filters remove some<br />

or all fluoride<br />

7. Agent Orange<br />

"In summary, we hold that fluoridation is an unreasonable risk." - US ENVIRONMENTAL<br />

PROTECTION AGENCY HEADQUARTERS' UNION, 2001.<br />

“Over the past ten years a large body of peer-reviewed science has raised concerns that fluoride<br />

174 175

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!