25.12.2014 Views

East Asia and Western Pacific METEOROLOGY AND CLIMATE

East Asia and Western Pacific METEOROLOGY AND CLIMATE

East Asia and Western Pacific METEOROLOGY AND CLIMATE

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

244<br />

reach the top of model atmosphere to show its percentage contribution in the total<br />

budget. The corresponding observed climatology from NRC (1975) is shown in<br />

Fig. 2. From Fig. 1 for the shortwave radiation (SW) part, the planetary albedo<br />

simulated by the model is 37.1%, the absorption within the atmosphere is 13%,<br />

<strong>and</strong> the surface absorption is 49.9%. In contrast to the observed climatology, the<br />

simulated planetary albedo is stronger than the observed (37% vs 30%), while<br />

the atmospheric absorption is consequently reduced (13% vs 19%). The simulated<br />

surface absorption is quite comparable to the observed (49.9% vs 51%). Simulated<br />

surface latent <strong>and</strong> sensible heat fluxes contribute 30% of the heat transfer from<br />

surface to the atmosphere, which are the same as those from observed climatology.<br />

For the longwave radiation (LW), the net upward outgoing LW from earth's<br />

surface is 20.8%, quite close to the observed estimate (21%). The simulated net<br />

longwave radiative cooling (sum over the radiative cooling in the atmosphere to<br />

the space <strong>and</strong> the absorption of longwave fluxes from surface to the atmosphere)<br />

in the model is 41.4%, <strong>and</strong> the observed value is 49%.<br />

The very recent ERBE estimate for the global radiative balance from Ramanathan<br />

et al. (1989) are reconstructed <strong>and</strong> shown in Fig. 3. The ERBE results<br />

differ with the NRC (1975) estimate slightly. The ERBE data shows a smaller<br />

earth absorption of SW (49.4% vs 51%), with a larger atmospheric absorption<br />

of SW (19.9% vs 19%). For the LW part, the ERBE estimate smaller net upward<br />

outgoing LW (18.4% vs 21%), while the surface fluxes <strong>and</strong> planetary albedo<br />

estimation are larger (31% vs 30%), (30.7% vs 30%), respectively.<br />

The main discrepancy in the model simulation is related to the overestimation<br />

of the planetary albedo <strong>and</strong> the underestimation of the atmospheric absorption in<br />

the SW. For the net longwave radiative cooling, it is underestimated by about 7%,<br />

which can clearly be attributed to the discrepancy in the shortwave simulation.<br />

This net atmospheric longwave cooling, in a global mean sense, has to be balanced<br />

by the atmospheric absorption of shortwave radiation <strong>and</strong> the heat fluxes from<br />

the earth's surface to the atmosphere. Fig. 2 identifies that value from observed<br />

climatology is 49% vs 19%+30% for NRC (1975) <strong>and</strong> 50.9% vs 19.9%+31% from<br />

ERBE, an exact balance. While the simulated balance is 41.4% vs 13%-f 30%.<br />

There is a small imbalance. This leaves the atmosphere with a small fraction of<br />

heating contribution. The sampling problem may be the cause of this imbalance.<br />

If more months can be included in the estimation of the annual mean, the balance<br />

should be achieved.<br />

As summarized in Ramanathan et al. (1989), clouds in general are shown<br />

to trap longwave radiation <strong>and</strong> reduce the emission of longwave radiation to the

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!