FOI-R--3990--SE_reducerad
FOI-R--3990--SE_reducerad
FOI-R--3990--SE_reducerad
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
<strong>FOI</strong>-R--<strong>3990</strong>--<strong>SE</strong><br />
1 Introduction<br />
Dr Mike Winnerstig, <strong>FOI</strong><br />
Since the end of the Cold War, the Baltic Sea area has been considered a fairly<br />
peaceful place. Although there have been certain residual fears, especially in<br />
Eastern Europe and the Baltic states, concerning the risk of future Russian<br />
revanchism, these were for many years dismissed by observers in Western<br />
Europe as exaggerated or generated by an unfortunate past.<br />
The Russian aggression against Ukraine and the illegal annexation of Crimea in<br />
2014 have, to a substantial degree, changed all this. Even if the direct military<br />
threat against the Baltic states has not increased, the obvious willingness of the<br />
Russian leadership to alter borders by force has been considered a game-changer<br />
in other parts of the world. Many observers have pointed out that the new and<br />
“creative” forms of warfare used in the Crimean operation, such as the<br />
infiltration of “little green men” – Russian soldiers without nationality markings<br />
on their uniforms – could be repeated elsewhere. At the time of writing, eastern<br />
Ukraine seems to be witnessing a substantial destabilization operation by “local<br />
self-defence forces” apparently heavily supported by Russian military elements. 1<br />
These developments have caused substantial concern not only in the Baltic states<br />
– the smallest and geographically closest neighbours of Russia – but also in<br />
Scandinavia and other parts of Europe. The major issue of debate is whether<br />
Russia would dare to act in a similar manner against countries that have been<br />
organizationally, politically and economically deeply rooted in the West for over<br />
20 years. Conventional wisdom states that it would not. The Baltic states are<br />
NATO members and thus an attack on them would be considered by US decision<br />
makers an attack against the United States too. The deterrence value of this is<br />
probably very high.<br />
There are, however, other forms of warfare, or at least highly antagonistic<br />
behaviour well short of a traditional military attack, that could be used against<br />
the Baltic states. Wielding influence against smaller neighbours is, after all,<br />
historically very common when it comes to great power behaviour. In the autumn<br />
of 2014, Russia acted against all three Baltic states within less than a month in a<br />
way that is well short of a military attack but still reeks of provocation: (a) an<br />
Estonian security police officer was abducted by Russian agents on the border<br />
between Russia and Estonia; (b) a high-ranking official from Moscow made a<br />
speech in Riga attacking the Baltic states for promoting fascism and human<br />
rights violations against their Russian-speaking minorities; (c) the Russian<br />
1 For a recent analysis of the Ukrainian crisis see Granholm, N., Malminen, J. and Persson, G.<br />
(2014), A Rude Awakening: Ramifications of Russian Aggression Toward Ukraine (Stockholm:<br />
<strong>FOI</strong>), <strong>FOI</strong>-R--3892--<strong>SE</strong>.<br />
14