25.12.2014 Views

FOI-R--3990--SE_reducerad

FOI-R--3990--SE_reducerad

FOI-R--3990--SE_reducerad

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>FOI</strong>-R--<strong>3990</strong>--<strong>SE</strong><br />

1 Introduction<br />

Dr Mike Winnerstig, <strong>FOI</strong><br />

Since the end of the Cold War, the Baltic Sea area has been considered a fairly<br />

peaceful place. Although there have been certain residual fears, especially in<br />

Eastern Europe and the Baltic states, concerning the risk of future Russian<br />

revanchism, these were for many years dismissed by observers in Western<br />

Europe as exaggerated or generated by an unfortunate past.<br />

The Russian aggression against Ukraine and the illegal annexation of Crimea in<br />

2014 have, to a substantial degree, changed all this. Even if the direct military<br />

threat against the Baltic states has not increased, the obvious willingness of the<br />

Russian leadership to alter borders by force has been considered a game-changer<br />

in other parts of the world. Many observers have pointed out that the new and<br />

“creative” forms of warfare used in the Crimean operation, such as the<br />

infiltration of “little green men” – Russian soldiers without nationality markings<br />

on their uniforms – could be repeated elsewhere. At the time of writing, eastern<br />

Ukraine seems to be witnessing a substantial destabilization operation by “local<br />

self-defence forces” apparently heavily supported by Russian military elements. 1<br />

These developments have caused substantial concern not only in the Baltic states<br />

– the smallest and geographically closest neighbours of Russia – but also in<br />

Scandinavia and other parts of Europe. The major issue of debate is whether<br />

Russia would dare to act in a similar manner against countries that have been<br />

organizationally, politically and economically deeply rooted in the West for over<br />

20 years. Conventional wisdom states that it would not. The Baltic states are<br />

NATO members and thus an attack on them would be considered by US decision<br />

makers an attack against the United States too. The deterrence value of this is<br />

probably very high.<br />

There are, however, other forms of warfare, or at least highly antagonistic<br />

behaviour well short of a traditional military attack, that could be used against<br />

the Baltic states. Wielding influence against smaller neighbours is, after all,<br />

historically very common when it comes to great power behaviour. In the autumn<br />

of 2014, Russia acted against all three Baltic states within less than a month in a<br />

way that is well short of a military attack but still reeks of provocation: (a) an<br />

Estonian security police officer was abducted by Russian agents on the border<br />

between Russia and Estonia; (b) a high-ranking official from Moscow made a<br />

speech in Riga attacking the Baltic states for promoting fascism and human<br />

rights violations against their Russian-speaking minorities; (c) the Russian<br />

1 For a recent analysis of the Ukrainian crisis see Granholm, N., Malminen, J. and Persson, G.<br />

(2014), A Rude Awakening: Ramifications of Russian Aggression Toward Ukraine (Stockholm:<br />

<strong>FOI</strong>), <strong>FOI</strong>-R--3892--<strong>SE</strong>.<br />

14

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!