29.12.2014 Views

Agenda - Byron Shire Council - NSW Government

Agenda - Byron Shire Council - NSW Government

Agenda - Byron Shire Council - NSW Government

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

BYRON SHIRE COUNCIL<br />

ORDINARY MEETING 9 MAY 2013 (61)<br />

Report<br />

5<br />

10<br />

15<br />

20<br />

25<br />

30<br />

35<br />

40<br />

45<br />

50<br />

Background<br />

Draft <strong>Byron</strong> LEP 2012 was publicly exhibited from 24 September to 24 December 2012. On<br />

14 February 2013 <strong>Council</strong> considered a report (13.11) on submissions from the public exhibition of<br />

Draft <strong>Byron</strong> LEP 2012 and resolved (13-26):<br />

1. That <strong>Council</strong> note the Draft <strong>Byron</strong> LEP 2012 Consultation Report as attached in Annexure<br />

13(a) (#E2013/6532).<br />

2. That <strong>Council</strong> adopt the process to complete the draft <strong>Byron</strong> LEP 2012 as per Table 1 of this<br />

report as amended to include investigation, ground truthing (as appropriate) and responding<br />

to submissions where mapping errors are noted.<br />

At <strong>Council</strong>’s Ordinary meetings of 14 March and 18 April 2013 <strong>Council</strong> considered reports on the<br />

outcomes of submissions analysis concerning the <strong>Byron</strong> Arts and Industry Estate and other<br />

Business and Industrial zones respectively.<br />

The purpose of this report is to present the outcomes of the analysis of submissions received on<br />

policy matters for residential zones and controls. The discussion paper at Annexure 12(a) provides<br />

a comprehensive stand-alone overview of the issues raised in submissions and the corresponding<br />

planning discussion and recommendations. Note that the recommendations of this report<br />

(including numbering) directly correspond with the recommendations presented in each part of the<br />

discussion paper at Annexure 12(a).<br />

Financial Implications<br />

In accordance with Resolution 13-137 the following information is provided to <strong>Council</strong> in all reports<br />

prepared for the 9 May, 13 and 27 June 2013 Ordinary Meetings:<br />

• The estimated combined staff hours for the preparation of this report was approximately 260<br />

hours (including time spent on background analysis, meetings, etc.)<br />

The other financial implications relate to the LEP Acceleration Funding Agreement with the State<br />

government and corresponding deadline for completion of the draft LEP. The amount of grant<br />

funding that can be claimed by <strong>Council</strong> will depend on its ability to maximise project delivery within<br />

the 2012/13 financial year.<br />

In addition, this report recommends that a <strong>Shire</strong>-wide residential strategy be prepared after the<br />

LEP gazettal to investigate future minimum lot size requirements for multi dwelling housing and<br />

residential flat buildings zones and better differentiation of development controls between the R2<br />

and R3 zones. <strong>Council</strong> will need to allocate sufficient funds from its budget should it proceed to<br />

adopt this recommendation.<br />

Statutory and Policy Compliance Implications<br />

There are a number of legislative requirements and policy considerations applicable to <strong>Council</strong>’s<br />

consideration of draft LEP submissions. The recommendations of this report are consistent with<br />

these legislative requirements and policies.<br />

For detailed discussion of the relevant statutory and policy considerations specific to <strong>Council</strong>’s<br />

consideration of the issues raised in submissions on residential zones and controls refer to the<br />

Discussion Paper at Annexure 12(a).<br />

Ordinary Meeting <strong>Agenda</strong> 09/05/13

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!