29.12.2014 Views

Agenda - Byron Shire Council - NSW Government

Agenda - Byron Shire Council - NSW Government

Agenda - Byron Shire Council - NSW Government

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

BYRON SHIRE COUNCIL<br />

ORDINARY MEETING 9 MAY 2013 (64)<br />

under State Environmental Planning Policy (Exempt and Complying Development Codes) 2008.<br />

This could further reduce Development Applications with SEPP No.1 variations.<br />

5<br />

10<br />

15<br />

20<br />

25<br />

30<br />

35<br />

40<br />

The Director General considered the reporting of boundary adjustment variations where there has<br />

been a variation in standards of greater than 10% under SEPP No.1 to be determined by full<br />

council should be maintained.<br />

There is no statutory requirement for determination of Development Applications with State<br />

Environmental Planning Policy No 1 variations by full council. As the majority of SEPP No.1<br />

variations relate to realignment of lot boundaries (lot sizes), it is recommend that all Development<br />

Applications with a State Environmental Planning Policy No 1 variation be determined by the<br />

General Manager or sub-delegated staff member. All Development Applications with SEPP No.1<br />

variations will be reported quarterly and be publicly available on-line to ensure transparency of<br />

these determinations whilst streamlining the determination process.<br />

A review of other development assessment matters required to be determined by the elected<br />

<strong>Council</strong> has noted that the following types of development could be streamlined by delegation to<br />

the General Manager.<br />

1. Development Applications for strata subdivision in a 7(f2)(Urban Coastal Land Zone) under<br />

clause 32 of the BLEP (Res 09-962).<br />

2. Development Applications with an estimated value not exceeding $3 million dollars or any<br />

subdivision not exceeding 20 lots. Note: Developments from $1,750,000 to $3,000,000 are<br />

required to be reported to the Planning Review Committee (Res 10-668(3)).<br />

As per the “Revised <strong>Council</strong> Meeting Schedule for 2013” report, being provided to this meeting of<br />

<strong>Council</strong>, the Planning Review Committee is proposed to be phased out by August 2013. A review<br />

of the criteria for the consideration of Development Applications to be determined directly by<br />

<strong>Council</strong> has been recommended to occur.<br />

To ensure that the streamlining of the holistic development reporting process can occur, a set of<br />

criteria / guidelines detailing which Development Applications are determined by the elected<br />

<strong>Council</strong> are to be developed.<br />

The preparation of the guidelines will have to consider that <strong>Council</strong>lor’s time is a valuable and<br />

limited resource so that only major developments having potential for significant community impact<br />

should be determined by full council. Major developments have been considered as Development<br />

Applications with an estimated value exceeding $5 million or any subdivision exceeding 40 lots.<br />

Additionally Section 377 of the Local <strong>Government</strong> Act 1993 specifies functions the <strong>Council</strong> can not<br />

delegate in relation to development assessments being:<br />

45<br />

<br />

the review of a determination made by the <strong>Council</strong>, and not by a delegate of the <strong>Council</strong>, of an<br />

application for approval or an application that may be reviewed under Section 82A of the<br />

Environmental planning and Assessment Act 1979<br />

50<br />

The reporting of smaller significant developments to <strong>Council</strong> may still occur where in the opinion of<br />

the General Manager or the Executive Manager, using professional judgement and considering the<br />

merits of the development, it is deemed necessary and appropriate.<br />

Financial Implications<br />

55<br />

There would be a saving in both <strong>Council</strong>lor and staff resources by reducing the number of<br />

development applications determined by <strong>Council</strong>.<br />

<br />

The estimated staff hours for the preparation of this report was approximately 15 hours<br />

Ordinary Meeting <strong>Agenda</strong> 09/05/13

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!