01.01.2015 Views

OECD Peer Review of E-Government in Denmark - ePractice.eu

OECD Peer Review of E-Government in Denmark - ePractice.eu

OECD Peer Review of E-Government in Denmark - ePractice.eu

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

had developed extensive practical knowledge <strong>in</strong> the area, and also identified barriers that needed to be<br />

overcome if government was to use digital signatures on a wide scale. The two biggest problems<br />

identified were <strong>in</strong>adequate knowledge <strong>of</strong> the use <strong>of</strong> digital signatures, and technical difficulties <strong>in</strong><br />

<strong>in</strong>stall<strong>in</strong>g and configur<strong>in</strong>g digital signature solutions.<br />

In 2003, the digital signature project advanced significantly when government decided to<br />

distribute signatures to citizens, bus<strong>in</strong>esses and public organisations free <strong>of</strong> charge.<br />

The Danish Knowledge Strategy<br />

Introduced <strong>in</strong> 2003, this strategy aims to develop a Danish “knowledge system” that ranks among<br />

the best <strong>in</strong> the world <strong>in</strong> terms <strong>of</strong> its efficiency and competitiveness. While primarily focused on the<br />

Danish knowledge system (the public and private sector knowledge <strong>in</strong>stitutions and companies which<br />

produce, attract, dissem<strong>in</strong>ate and apply research-based and other advanced knowledge) the strategy<br />

recognises the fundamental relationship between public sector use <strong>of</strong> ICT and the future success <strong>of</strong> the<br />

knowledge system.<br />

The strategy notes the major efforts made throughout the 1990s and <strong>in</strong>to the 2000s to ensure that<br />

e-government provided Danes with easier access to the public sector, and stresses the importance <strong>of</strong><br />

maximiz<strong>in</strong>g the benefits <strong>of</strong> this <strong>in</strong> terms <strong>of</strong> achiev<strong>in</strong>g both better government and stronger economic<br />

growth. It then notes the e-government challenge <strong>of</strong> develop<strong>in</strong>g and us<strong>in</strong>g ICT to support better<br />

collaboration and exchange <strong>of</strong> data across traditional organisational boundaries, both with<strong>in</strong> the public<br />

sector and between the public and private sectors. The strategy identifies or cross-references e-<br />

government <strong>in</strong>itiatives <strong>in</strong> the areas <strong>of</strong> IT security, digital signatures and the development <strong>of</strong> common<br />

XML schemas for data exchange. It also states that the <strong>Government</strong>’s future ICT and<br />

telecommunications policy action plan will focus on mak<strong>in</strong>g progress <strong>in</strong> areas where State government<br />

can “usefully be viewed as one unit <strong>in</strong> relation to IT usage” such as development <strong>of</strong> ICT architecture<br />

and common networks, benchmark<strong>in</strong>g, and s<strong>of</strong>tware strategy.<br />

First steps towards e-government<br />

Get go<strong>in</strong>g with e-<strong>Government</strong><br />

In 1997, the first explicit e-government step was taken under the leadership <strong>of</strong> the M<strong>in</strong>istry <strong>of</strong><br />

Research and Information Technology. Called Get go<strong>in</strong>g with e-<strong>Government</strong>, the report was an<br />

attempt to put e-government on the policy agenda and improve the implementation <strong>of</strong> e-government<br />

by emphasis<strong>in</strong>g benefits such as efficiency ga<strong>in</strong>s, rationalisation, and delivery <strong>of</strong> better public services<br />

to citizens and bus<strong>in</strong>esses. The report aimed to guide and <strong>in</strong>spire public sector organisations that had<br />

plans to implement e-government, especially <strong>in</strong> relation to electronic document management systems<br />

(EDMS). It gave examples <strong>of</strong> how e-government visions and goals should be formulated, as well as<br />

how management should behave.<br />

The report was complemented by another report called E-government – Requirements for<br />

Systems, which conta<strong>in</strong>ed advice to government organisations on specify<strong>in</strong>g requirements for EDMS.<br />

The report identified common core needs, issues and check po<strong>in</strong>ts that should be identified and<br />

addressed with<strong>in</strong> each organisation. The ma<strong>in</strong> recommendation was for organisations (m<strong>in</strong>istries <strong>in</strong><br />

particular) to buy one system for the whole organisation, rather than allow<strong>in</strong>g each part <strong>of</strong> the<br />

organisation (i.e. departments, agencies, etc.) to make its own choices.<br />

It also proposed development <strong>of</strong> a common strategy for electronic document management across<br />

the whole <strong>of</strong> State government. The proposal po<strong>in</strong>ted out that top management <strong>in</strong> organisations was<br />

180

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!