01.01.2015 Views

OECD Peer Review of E-Government in Denmark - ePractice.eu

OECD Peer Review of E-Government in Denmark - ePractice.eu

OECD Peer Review of E-Government in Denmark - ePractice.eu

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g government organisations’ awareness and understand<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> the purpose and scope <strong>of</strong> the<br />

e-government programme; 3) develop<strong>in</strong>g more collaboration over e-government between agencies and<br />

across levels <strong>of</strong> government; and 4) strik<strong>in</strong>g the right balance between centralised co-ord<strong>in</strong>ation and<br />

decentralised implementation <strong>of</strong> e-government.<br />

The overarch<strong>in</strong>g e-government challenge currently faced by <strong>Denmark</strong> is the question <strong>of</strong> how,<br />

dur<strong>in</strong>g a period <strong>of</strong> major organisational change and fiscal constra<strong>in</strong>t, it can ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong> or even <strong>in</strong>crease<br />

progress towards its e-government goals <strong>of</strong> develop<strong>in</strong>g a more efficient and user-focused public sector<br />

support<strong>in</strong>g a more competitive economy, and a vibrant Danish <strong>in</strong>formation society.<br />

1. E-government structure and context<br />

<strong>Denmark</strong> is home to 5.3 million people, the vast majority (85%) <strong>of</strong> whom live <strong>in</strong> urban areas. The<br />

standard <strong>of</strong> liv<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> <strong>Denmark</strong> is high. The country ranked 17 th among the 177 countries that made up<br />

the United Nations Development Programme Human Development Index (HDI) <strong>in</strong> 2004. <strong>Denmark</strong> is<br />

a relatively small, open economy with high per capita GDP. Almost three-quarters <strong>of</strong> the Danish<br />

workforce work <strong>in</strong> the service sector, with 31% be<strong>in</strong>g employed <strong>in</strong> the public sector.<br />

There is a favourable environment for development <strong>of</strong> e-government <strong>in</strong> <strong>Denmark</strong>. E-government<br />

enjoys good, albeit <strong>in</strong>direct, political support. Past and present governments have placed strong policy<br />

emphasis on mak<strong>in</strong>g the best possible public and private sector use <strong>of</strong> ICT <strong>in</strong> pursuit <strong>of</strong> both social and<br />

economic goals.<br />

The Danish <strong>in</strong>stitutional environment supports the implementation <strong>of</strong> e-government. Positive<br />

factors <strong>in</strong>clude: 1) the fact that effective use <strong>of</strong> ICT has been a feature <strong>of</strong> government policy for<br />

several decades; 2) the existence <strong>of</strong> a political and adm<strong>in</strong>istrative culture <strong>of</strong> compromise and<br />

consensus, support<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>volvement <strong>of</strong> all levels <strong>of</strong> government <strong>in</strong> e-government; 3) the position<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong><br />

e-government as an enabler <strong>of</strong> other major government policies; and 4) the fact that local government<br />

(which is fully engaged <strong>in</strong> the national e-government programme) delivers many public services,<br />

allow<strong>in</strong>g for close government-citizen relationships.<br />

Between 2005 and 2007, sweep<strong>in</strong>g reforms <strong>of</strong> the structure <strong>of</strong> the public sector (“the Structural<br />

Reform”) will be the dom<strong>in</strong>ant factor <strong>in</strong> the environment for e-government. These reforms will impact<br />

on both State and local government, but will have the most effect at the local level, where fewer<br />

organisations will deliver an <strong>in</strong>creased share <strong>of</strong> public functions and services – especially at the<br />

municipal level where 271 municipalities will be reduced (through mergers) to 98, and 14 counties<br />

will become 5 regions.<br />

The Structural Reform goals <strong>of</strong> mak<strong>in</strong>g government more coherent, user-focused and efficient are<br />

congruent with the goals <strong>of</strong> the Danish e-government strategy, and the long-term success <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Structural Reform will be <strong>in</strong>fluenced by application <strong>of</strong> e-government at all levels <strong>of</strong> government.<br />

Officials <strong>in</strong>terviewed for this review regarded the Structural Reform process as be<strong>in</strong>g both a major<br />

opportunity for e-government to contribute to the <strong>Government</strong>’s wider goals, and a potential challenge<br />

for e-government due to the risk <strong>of</strong> divided attention and resources. There was particular concern that<br />

the costs <strong>of</strong> change to local government ICT systems may have been underestimated <strong>in</strong> the plann<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong><br />

the Reform. The <strong>Government</strong> is rely<strong>in</strong>g on these costs be<strong>in</strong>g funded from sav<strong>in</strong>gs that it expects will<br />

result from the Reform. Any failure to achieve these sav<strong>in</strong>gs, or to ensure that they are not exceeded<br />

by the costs <strong>of</strong> change, could underm<strong>in</strong>e the success <strong>of</strong> the Structural Reform and/or limit achievement<br />

<strong>of</strong> e-government objectives. There was also a feel<strong>in</strong>g that, because e-government is not explicitly<br />

addressed as part <strong>of</strong> the Structural Reform, an opportunity to <strong>in</strong>crease achievement <strong>of</strong> e-government<br />

goals with<strong>in</strong> and across the different levels <strong>of</strong> government may have been lost, or dim<strong>in</strong>ished.<br />

7

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!