01.01.2015 Views

OECD Peer Review of E-Government in Denmark - ePractice.eu

OECD Peer Review of E-Government in Denmark - ePractice.eu

OECD Peer Review of E-Government in Denmark - ePractice.eu

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Denmark</strong> – someth<strong>in</strong>g that could be achieved through “mutual recognition” <strong>of</strong> public and privately<br />

issued signatures. <strong>Government</strong> is will<strong>in</strong>g to recognise privately issued signatures as long as they<br />

comply (as appropriate) with the standards specified <strong>in</strong> <strong>Denmark</strong>’s electronic signature legislation.<br />

However, it appears that for the foreseeable future it will be us<strong>in</strong>g the PKI and digital certificates<br />

provided by TDC.<br />

Implement<strong>in</strong>g the PKI has brought some challenges. Free, s<strong>of</strong>tware-based, digital signatures with<br />

passwords l<strong>in</strong>ked to CRS numbers were provided to <strong>in</strong>dividuals to <strong>in</strong>stall and use on their PCs. While<br />

this process is relatively straightforward, the issu<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> so-called “employee signatures” is more<br />

difficult due to the need to establish the actual and legal relationship between employees and their<br />

employers as part <strong>of</strong> the cha<strong>in</strong> for issu<strong>in</strong>g and manag<strong>in</strong>g digital signatures. Achiev<strong>in</strong>g this has required<br />

a complex process <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>stall<strong>in</strong>g special s<strong>of</strong>tware on employers’ <strong>in</strong>formation systems, and<br />

implementation <strong>of</strong> a fee system for employers who wish to have more than 10 employee signatures<br />

issued to their staff. This fact, along with some user-education issues and technical difficulties<br />

experienced <strong>in</strong> deploy<strong>in</strong>g and manag<strong>in</strong>g digital signatures across the diverse platform <strong>of</strong> PCs <strong>in</strong> use <strong>in</strong><br />

Danish homes and bus<strong>in</strong>esses, contributed to slower than desired uptake <strong>of</strong> digital signatures dur<strong>in</strong>g<br />

2004 – especially among bus<strong>in</strong>esses, for which more PKI-enabled services are currently available. To<br />

counter this, <strong>in</strong> late 2004 the Danish Commerce and Companies Agency began a telemarket<strong>in</strong>g<br />

campaign to encourage Danish bus<strong>in</strong>esses to adopt the digital signature, promot<strong>in</strong>g the benefits <strong>of</strong><br />

do<strong>in</strong>g so <strong>in</strong> connection with the e-government services provided through the virk.dk bus<strong>in</strong>ess portal. In<br />

<strong>in</strong>terviews, <strong>of</strong>ficials advised that the campaign was prov<strong>in</strong>g successful, with an approximately 50%<br />

success rate <strong>in</strong> conv<strong>in</strong>c<strong>in</strong>g bus<strong>in</strong>esses to adopt digital signatures.<br />

In <strong>in</strong>terviews where the question <strong>of</strong> uptake <strong>of</strong> digital signatures was discussed, two major<br />

challenges were identified: 1) the need to develop useful e-government services to drive use <strong>of</strong> digital<br />

signatures (more so for citizens than bus<strong>in</strong>esses at this stage); and 2) the fact that the architecture <strong>of</strong><br />

the PKI does not allow for development <strong>of</strong> PKI-enabled services designed to be delivered on mobile<br />

platforms. While not yet a real problem, it is expected that this situation will become more problematic<br />

as demand for mobile e-government <strong>in</strong>creases over the medium to long term. Other <strong>in</strong>terviewees<br />

mentioned the long time frames required to implement a large-scale ICT <strong>in</strong>frastructure <strong>of</strong> this type as<br />

be<strong>in</strong>g another challenge.<br />

Key po<strong>in</strong>t 6.2<br />

<strong>Denmark</strong> has chosen to develop a Public Key Infrastructure (PKI) as a key part <strong>of</strong> its common public sector ICT<br />

<strong>in</strong>frastructure. As a result <strong>of</strong> the eDay2 <strong>in</strong>itiative, virtually all government organisations are now able to handle<br />

electronic communications <strong>in</strong>volv<strong>in</strong>g digital signatures.<br />

The <strong>Government</strong> chose to develop its own PKI <strong>in</strong>stead <strong>of</strong> adopt<strong>in</strong>g the Net-ID system proposed, and<br />

subsequently implemented, by a consortium from the Danish bank<strong>in</strong>g sector. The decision-mak<strong>in</strong>g process<br />

highlights both the complexity <strong>of</strong> PKI and its strategic importance to both e-government and e-commerce <strong>in</strong><br />

<strong>Denmark</strong>.<br />

<strong>Government</strong> and the bank<strong>in</strong>g sector cont<strong>in</strong>ue to discuss the future development <strong>of</strong> their respective PKI systems.<br />

Meanwhile, the e-government strategy targets distribution <strong>of</strong> 1.1 million digital signatures by the end <strong>of</strong> 2006;<br />

425 817 had been issued by September 2005. To achieve the goal, government will have to make sure that: 1) it<br />

is develop<strong>in</strong>g useful PKI enabled e-government services; 2) difficulties <strong>in</strong> implement<strong>in</strong>g digital signatures for<br />

employees are effectively addressed; and 3) the benefits <strong>of</strong> digital signatures are promoted to e-government<br />

users.<br />

98

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!