02.01.2015 Views

Report - Government Executive

Report - Government Executive

Report - Government Executive

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY<br />

The terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001, ushered in an era of fundamental change to the<br />

Intelligence Community (IC), and underscored the urgent need for improvements in the way its<br />

agencies assess and manage their human resources. Studies conducted in the wake of the attacks<br />

conclude that agencies missed or misinterpreted signals pointing to a major terrorist attack, and<br />

that they failed to “connect the dots” linking the actions of the 9/11 terrorists to the plot.<br />

Creating a unified human capital framework that encourages individuals and intelligence<br />

agencies to work together toward a common goal became a cornerstone of the reform efforts. By<br />

implementing a human resources management system that more directly links pay to<br />

performance, the Department of Defense is seeking to improve both individual and<br />

organizational performance through greater cooperation and collaboration that will ultimately<br />

lead to better intelligence products. These products will enable America’s military, security,<br />

and law enforcement personnel to better perform their jobs and thwart attacks.<br />

In this way, at its most fundamental level, the Defense Civilian Intelligence Personnel System<br />

(DCIPS) is intended to help protect the national security interests of the United States. Lee<br />

Hamilton, former Congressman, Chairman of the House Permanent Select committee on<br />

Intelligence, and Vice Chairman of the 9/11 Commission, highlighted for the Academy Panel the<br />

importance of a unified, performance-based IC personnel system to the nation’s ability to defend<br />

against terrorist attacks:<br />

…[T]he necessity of defense against a terrorist attack is urgent… I am a real radical on<br />

personnel systems…[Y]ou need to have incentives to produce preeminent<br />

analysts…When you think about civilian personnel, I hope you are thinking about the<br />

importance of the analyst in driving the actions and direction of the agency.<br />

DCIPS was the result of an effort to develop a unified, performance-based human resources<br />

management system for nine U.S. Department of Defense (DoD) intelligence components,<br />

whose collective mission is to protect the national security of the United States. The system is in<br />

various stages of implementation in each of the components, and is ultimately expected to affect<br />

more than 50,000 employees.<br />

In large part due to perceptions that DCIPS could result in unfair treatment of minorities and<br />

women, the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) for Fiscal Year 2010 directed the<br />

Secretary of Defense, the Director of the Office of Personnel Management, and the Director of<br />

National Intelligence (DNI) to designate an independent organization to conduct a review of<br />

DCIPS. In anticipation of the review, NDAA suspended the base-pay setting portions of the<br />

DCIPS’ performance-based compensation system until December 31, 2010; however, it<br />

preserved DoD’s authority to award bonuses, maintain a pay-band structure, and implement the<br />

performance evaluation process under DCIPS.<br />

Selected in January 2010 to conduct the review, the National Academy of Public Administration<br />

(Academy) appointed an expert Panel to assess and make recommendations regarding DCIPS’<br />

design, implementation, and impact.<br />

xi

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!