Report - Government Executive
Report - Government Executive
Report - Government Executive
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY<br />
The terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001, ushered in an era of fundamental change to the<br />
Intelligence Community (IC), and underscored the urgent need for improvements in the way its<br />
agencies assess and manage their human resources. Studies conducted in the wake of the attacks<br />
conclude that agencies missed or misinterpreted signals pointing to a major terrorist attack, and<br />
that they failed to “connect the dots” linking the actions of the 9/11 terrorists to the plot.<br />
Creating a unified human capital framework that encourages individuals and intelligence<br />
agencies to work together toward a common goal became a cornerstone of the reform efforts. By<br />
implementing a human resources management system that more directly links pay to<br />
performance, the Department of Defense is seeking to improve both individual and<br />
organizational performance through greater cooperation and collaboration that will ultimately<br />
lead to better intelligence products. These products will enable America’s military, security,<br />
and law enforcement personnel to better perform their jobs and thwart attacks.<br />
In this way, at its most fundamental level, the Defense Civilian Intelligence Personnel System<br />
(DCIPS) is intended to help protect the national security interests of the United States. Lee<br />
Hamilton, former Congressman, Chairman of the House Permanent Select committee on<br />
Intelligence, and Vice Chairman of the 9/11 Commission, highlighted for the Academy Panel the<br />
importance of a unified, performance-based IC personnel system to the nation’s ability to defend<br />
against terrorist attacks:<br />
…[T]he necessity of defense against a terrorist attack is urgent… I am a real radical on<br />
personnel systems…[Y]ou need to have incentives to produce preeminent<br />
analysts…When you think about civilian personnel, I hope you are thinking about the<br />
importance of the analyst in driving the actions and direction of the agency.<br />
DCIPS was the result of an effort to develop a unified, performance-based human resources<br />
management system for nine U.S. Department of Defense (DoD) intelligence components,<br />
whose collective mission is to protect the national security of the United States. The system is in<br />
various stages of implementation in each of the components, and is ultimately expected to affect<br />
more than 50,000 employees.<br />
In large part due to perceptions that DCIPS could result in unfair treatment of minorities and<br />
women, the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) for Fiscal Year 2010 directed the<br />
Secretary of Defense, the Director of the Office of Personnel Management, and the Director of<br />
National Intelligence (DNI) to designate an independent organization to conduct a review of<br />
DCIPS. In anticipation of the review, NDAA suspended the base-pay setting portions of the<br />
DCIPS’ performance-based compensation system until December 31, 2010; however, it<br />
preserved DoD’s authority to award bonuses, maintain a pay-band structure, and implement the<br />
performance evaluation process under DCIPS.<br />
Selected in January 2010 to conduct the review, the National Academy of Public Administration<br />
(Academy) appointed an expert Panel to assess and make recommendations regarding DCIPS’<br />
design, implementation, and impact.<br />
xi