Report - Government Executive
Report - Government Executive
Report - Government Executive
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
eplaces the current government-wide locality pay methodology. Achieving full market<br />
comparability is necessary if DoD intelligence components are to succeed in attracting and<br />
retaining top talent and becoming “the employer of choice.”<br />
The Panel is encouraged that OUSD(I) has begun to develop an approach for conducting surveys<br />
to assess salary comparability with appropriate markets. This will be helpful to gain further<br />
support for DCIPS. Additionally, OUSD(I) reported an ongoing review of compensation in the<br />
continental United States, Hawaii, Alaska, and Pacific Islands to assess pay comparability.<br />
These steps will help ensure that all three aspects of equity are fully integrated into the design.<br />
Appendix I provides an overview of MITRE’s performance-based compensation system, another<br />
approach for achieving internal equity. The Panel believes that this example includes some<br />
features that may be usefully modeled in DCIPS’ design. For example, the ability to “refine”<br />
ratings within a rating level provides managers an opportunity to further distinguish levels of<br />
performance when it is appropriate to do so.<br />
Finding 3-7<br />
DCIPS successfully balances internal, external/market, and contribution equity, but internal<br />
equity could be enhanced by a more structured approach to pay pool composition to ensure that<br />
employees with similar duties, responsibilities, and performance ratings are treated equitably.<br />
45