02.01.2015 Views

Report - Government Executive

Report - Government Executive

Report - Government Executive

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

eplaces the current government-wide locality pay methodology. Achieving full market<br />

comparability is necessary if DoD intelligence components are to succeed in attracting and<br />

retaining top talent and becoming “the employer of choice.”<br />

The Panel is encouraged that OUSD(I) has begun to develop an approach for conducting surveys<br />

to assess salary comparability with appropriate markets. This will be helpful to gain further<br />

support for DCIPS. Additionally, OUSD(I) reported an ongoing review of compensation in the<br />

continental United States, Hawaii, Alaska, and Pacific Islands to assess pay comparability.<br />

These steps will help ensure that all three aspects of equity are fully integrated into the design.<br />

Appendix I provides an overview of MITRE’s performance-based compensation system, another<br />

approach for achieving internal equity. The Panel believes that this example includes some<br />

features that may be usefully modeled in DCIPS’ design. For example, the ability to “refine”<br />

ratings within a rating level provides managers an opportunity to further distinguish levels of<br />

performance when it is appropriate to do so.<br />

Finding 3-7<br />

DCIPS successfully balances internal, external/market, and contribution equity, but internal<br />

equity could be enhanced by a more structured approach to pay pool composition to ensure that<br />

employees with similar duties, responsibilities, and performance ratings are treated equitably.<br />

45

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!