02.01.2015 Views

Report - Government Executive

Report - Government Executive

Report - Government Executive

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Although the salary and bonus increase algorithms are intended to achieve internal equity, the<br />

pay pools’ structure and composition also have an impact on equity. DCIPS policy allows DoD<br />

intelligence components to use their own discretion in structuring pay pools based on such<br />

considerations as:<br />

• organizational structure and geographic distribution<br />

• number of employees and their occupational composition, work levels, and work<br />

categories<br />

• size and manageability of the pay pool<br />

• “line of sight” between the reviewing authority and pay pool officials and the work of<br />

the pay pool members<br />

Providing this flexibility to the components has the potential to introduce variation in the size<br />

and composition of pay pools, which can influence an employee’s performance-based salary<br />

increase or bonus. For example, a pay pool with many high-salaried employees will be funded at<br />

a higher dollar amount than one with a relatively lower salary mix, thus making more funds<br />

available to the former. Similarly, pay pools with a greater percentage of employees with high<br />

performance ratings can affect potential payouts because the higher ratings will dilute payouts<br />

from the available funds. 78 Wide variations in pay pool size is especially evident at larger DoD<br />

agencies such as DIA, where it was reported that the smallest pay pool had 37 employees and the<br />

largest had 2,205 employees. 31<br />

OUSD(I) officials acknowledge that the policy on structuring pay pools provides too much<br />

discretion to components and can result in inconsistent treatment of employees in the same pay<br />

band who perform at the same level. Absent more controls and guidance in the design, the<br />

perceptions of unfairness may be more prevalent. Additional policies and clarifying guidance<br />

are needed to ensure increased equity among pay pools in these decisions.<br />

Allowing components to include different occupational groups in the same pay pool also raises<br />

issues impacting equity. As noted previously, employees in administrative and support<br />

occupations have less direct impact on the mission and may be viewed as less worthy of rewards<br />

for their performance than other employees in mission-critical occupations. This situation could<br />

result in disparate impact on employees due to the nature of their work, rather than the quality of<br />

their performance.<br />

External/Market Equity<br />

External/market equity is necessary to ensure that employee salaries are competitive with those<br />

outside the agency. Currently, DCIPS is designed to achieve external equity through use of the<br />

Local Market Supplement (LMS), which initially will tie to GS/GG locality pay areas and<br />

associated locality rates. However, DCIPS’ goal is to develop a market pricing methodology that<br />

78<br />

ODNI modeling generally showed that payout results were much more consistent for pay pools of 100 or more<br />

employees.<br />

31<br />

DIA Briefing at DCIPS Interim Conference, Southbridge, Massachusetts, Feb. 2010.<br />

44

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!