Report - Government Executive
Report - Government Executive
Report - Government Executive
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
• The workforce is very geographically dispersed.<br />
Successfully implementing DCIPS requires a well-formulated and -executed strategy based on<br />
sound change management principles and taking into account significant differences in culture.<br />
The NDAA pause is yet another challenge to implementation. DCIPS Interim, put into place<br />
following the suspension of DCIPS pay authorities, has been a source of confusion, frustration,<br />
and discouragement for many in the workforce, including HR implementers. For example, many<br />
negative sentiments expressed by DoD intelligence component personnel appear to be strongly<br />
influenced by the effects of the NDAA pause, and have little to do with DCIPS overall. Thus,<br />
implementation has been attempted in an environment beset by internal and external challenges.<br />
This chapter focuses on how DCIPS has been implemented and addresses the provision of the<br />
NDAA requiring an assessment of the adequacy of the training, policy guidelines, and other<br />
preparations afforded in connection with transitioning to that system. The OPM Alternative<br />
Personnel Systems Objectives-Based Assessment Framework was used as the basis to assess<br />
DCIPS’ implementation. 110 Using this framework, and the elements considered essential to<br />
effective implementation of alternative pay systems, the Panel provides a series of findings,<br />
conclusions, and recommendations.<br />
EVALUATION FRAMEWORK<br />
OPM’s Alternative Personnel Systems Objectives-Based Assessment Framework has been used<br />
to guide the Panel’s assessment of DCIPS implementation. 111 The dimensions and elements that<br />
comprise the framework (see Table 4-1) are based on lessons learned from federal government<br />
demonstration projects involving alternative personnel systems, as well as best practices drawn<br />
from large human capital transformation programs.<br />
The standards used to assess DCIPS’ design in Chapter 3 focused on the presence or absence of<br />
necessary policies and provisions. By contrast, the framework is based on indicators of how well<br />
the DoD intelligence components prepared for implementation and are meeting the objectives.<br />
110 OPM, Alternative Personnel Systems Objective-Based Assessment Framework, Oct. 2008. Hereafter “the<br />
framework.”<br />
111 Ibid.<br />
60