02.01.2015 Views

Report - Government Executive

Report - Government Executive

Report - Government Executive

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

• The workforce is very geographically dispersed.<br />

Successfully implementing DCIPS requires a well-formulated and -executed strategy based on<br />

sound change management principles and taking into account significant differences in culture.<br />

The NDAA pause is yet another challenge to implementation. DCIPS Interim, put into place<br />

following the suspension of DCIPS pay authorities, has been a source of confusion, frustration,<br />

and discouragement for many in the workforce, including HR implementers. For example, many<br />

negative sentiments expressed by DoD intelligence component personnel appear to be strongly<br />

influenced by the effects of the NDAA pause, and have little to do with DCIPS overall. Thus,<br />

implementation has been attempted in an environment beset by internal and external challenges.<br />

This chapter focuses on how DCIPS has been implemented and addresses the provision of the<br />

NDAA requiring an assessment of the adequacy of the training, policy guidelines, and other<br />

preparations afforded in connection with transitioning to that system. The OPM Alternative<br />

Personnel Systems Objectives-Based Assessment Framework was used as the basis to assess<br />

DCIPS’ implementation. 110 Using this framework, and the elements considered essential to<br />

effective implementation of alternative pay systems, the Panel provides a series of findings,<br />

conclusions, and recommendations.<br />

EVALUATION FRAMEWORK<br />

OPM’s Alternative Personnel Systems Objectives-Based Assessment Framework has been used<br />

to guide the Panel’s assessment of DCIPS implementation. 111 The dimensions and elements that<br />

comprise the framework (see Table 4-1) are based on lessons learned from federal government<br />

demonstration projects involving alternative personnel systems, as well as best practices drawn<br />

from large human capital transformation programs.<br />

The standards used to assess DCIPS’ design in Chapter 3 focused on the presence or absence of<br />

necessary policies and provisions. By contrast, the framework is based on indicators of how well<br />

the DoD intelligence components prepared for implementation and are meeting the objectives.<br />

110 OPM, Alternative Personnel Systems Objective-Based Assessment Framework, Oct. 2008. Hereafter “the<br />

framework.”<br />

111 Ibid.<br />

60

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!