Report - Government Executive
Report - Government Executive
Report - Government Executive
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
cooperation with ODNI. The review will focus on the performance elements, with a view<br />
toward simplifying and reducing their number, ensuring their relevance and value, and verifying<br />
that standards measure as intended. These steps should help to strengthen the performance<br />
management system so that it is effective in achieving desired outcomes in a fair and equitable<br />
manner.<br />
EQUITY<br />
PRINCIPLE<br />
The system identifies the balance among the three aspects of equity: internal,<br />
external/market, and performance/contribution.<br />
In its 2004 report, 74 an Academy Panel noted that performance-based compensation systems are<br />
designed to conform to “equity theory”—that is, employees perform best if they know their<br />
compensation is commensurate with the work they perform and understand how others are<br />
compensated. Employees expect equitable treatment, and their perceptions of equity affect job<br />
satisfaction. The generally accepted elements of equity include internal, external/market, and<br />
contribution equity.<br />
In the federal government, internal equity traditionally has been achieved through the<br />
classification process, which requires jobs with similar duties and responsibilities to be assigned<br />
the same grade, resulting in “equal pay for equal work.” Under performance-based<br />
compensation systems, however, internal equity is redefined so that individual performance has<br />
greater impact on compensation, linking it more directly to accomplishments and organizational<br />
contribution.. External/market equity advocates paying employees at salary levels comparable to<br />
those available in other organizations, both inside and outside the federal government.<br />
Contribution equity holds that employees who contribute or perform at higher levels deserve<br />
higher salaries.<br />
As discussed below, DCIPS’ design includes features that balance the three aspects of equity in<br />
the performance management, pay pool, and market alignment features of the system.<br />
Internal Equity/Organizational Contribution<br />
Employees are more likely to accept compensation decisions if they perceive that the procedures<br />
used to make them are fair and affect everyone the same. Under DCIPS, internal equity is<br />
achieved by linking eligibility for salary increases and bonuses to employees’ ratings of record,<br />
which reflect their accomplishments for the rating period and their achievement of specific<br />
objectives supporting the organization’s mission, goals, and objectives. A Successful<br />
performance rating entitles the employee to receive at least the “floor” 75 of the annual<br />
74 2004 Academy Panel Design Principles Study, p. 15.<br />
75 The minimum performance increase in base salary that an employee performing at the Successful level and<br />
eligible for a performance payout may receive. USD(I) establishes the amount annually. Under DCIPS, the amount<br />
initially equals the annual General Pay Increase that Congress authorizes annually for federal GS employees.<br />
41