02.01.2015 Views

Report - Government Executive

Report - Government Executive

Report - Government Executive

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

employees received performance ratings, salary increases, and bonuses under the methodology.<br />

Intelligence employees in DIA, NSA, the Navy, Marine Corps, and OUSD(I) received<br />

performance ratings and bonuses under DCIPS, but were precluded from receiving salary<br />

increases during NDAA-imposed interim period. For these agencies, this was a mock pay pool<br />

exercise and analysis. Air Force, Army, and DSS did not participate and were not included in<br />

the analysis.<br />

Approximately 97.3 percent of DCIPS employees received a performance evaluation for the<br />

2009 cycle, and 98.2 percent of those were eligible to receive a bonus. 164 Approximately 99.5<br />

percent of rated employees received an evaluation of record of Successful or higher, meaning<br />

that almost all employees were eligible to receive performance bonuses and performance-based<br />

pay increases. In the mock pay pools, about 44 percent of employees would have received both<br />

a performance salary increase and performance bonus. 165 The remaining population was split<br />

between those who would have received a bonus but no salary increase (less than 1 percent) and<br />

vice versa (55 percent). Ratings rose with pay band, and supervisors rated higher in Pay Bands<br />

3, 4, and 5 than did non-supervisors.<br />

The analysis also showed that differences across pay pools complicated the investigation of<br />

performance ratings due to differences in work demands, the mix of jobs and experience, and the<br />

application of the common performance indicators and benchmarks in a local context. As with<br />

the separate analysis conducted by NGA, discussed below, this analysis could not determine<br />

whether variances in ratings assigned to employees in certain protected classes reflected<br />

legitimate performance differences, and thus this issue requires further review.<br />

OUSD(I) DCIPS Survey Results<br />

The preliminary results of the OUSD(I) DCIPS Survey present a mixed picture of DCIPS.<br />

Although employees overwhelmingly (81 percent) agreed or strongly agreed with the concept of<br />

performance-based compensation in principle, 166 far fewer agreed that their performance would<br />

be more effectively recognized under DCIPS than under GS (22 percent) or that career<br />

advancement opportunities would be greater (15 percent). 167<br />

There is much greater agreement that DCIPS allows employees to understand their performance<br />

objectives and how their work relates to organizational goals and priorities (78 percent). 168<br />

Employees also agreed that their supervisors know and understand what they do (69 percent) and<br />

take an interest in their success (65 percent). 169 Fewer agreed that supervisors provide helpful<br />

explanations of the bases for ratings under DCIPS (53 percent), that ratings were fair (54<br />

“2009 DCIPS Payout Analysis.”<br />

164 DCIPS Payout Analysis.<br />

165 Ibid. DCIPS guidance is that, in order to ensure that bonus amounts are meaningful, no more than 50 percent of<br />

employees generally should receive a bonus.<br />

166 2010 DCIPS Survey Preliminary Results, Question 10.. Response choices included “Strongly Disagree,”<br />

“Disagree,” “Neither Agree nor Disagree,” “Agree,” and “Strongly Agree.”<br />

167 Ibid. Questions 11, 13.<br />

168 Ibid. Questions 49, 68.<br />

169 Ibid. Questions 58, 67<br />

97

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!