Report - Government Executive
Report - Government Executive
Report - Government Executive
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
3. Implementing DCIPS;<br />
4. Evaluating the Success of DCIPS; and<br />
5. Life-Cycle Support.<br />
The program plan does not provide sufficient detail or milestones; it refers to an “established<br />
timeline” but does not include it. Further, its focus is on tactical strategies; references to change<br />
management issues are vague and few in number.<br />
In addition, the program plan was not followed. DCIPS policies and processes were to have<br />
been developed in the first phase of implementation. In reality, the timelines for Phases 1<br />
through 3 were compressed and overlapping, and key policies were not ready at the outset.<br />
Finding 4-11<br />
The Program Plan for DCIPS Implementation does not focus sufficiently on change management<br />
and lacks milestones for measuring progress.<br />
HR Business Processes and Procedures<br />
According to the OPM framework, business processes and procedures related to an alternative<br />
personnel system should be documented prior to implementation. 138 These processes and<br />
procedures provide the foundation for the development of automated tools, training materials,<br />
and other implementation activities.<br />
A major flaw of DCIPS’ implementation is that components were transitioned to DCIPS before<br />
processes, procedures, and roles and responsibilities were finalized. For example, the DoD<br />
policies, procedures, and responsibilities regarding performance management and for the DCIPS<br />
occupational structure were not finalized until August 2009—two years after implementation<br />
began. Although interim final regulations were signed in July 2008 for performance<br />
management, occupational structure, and pay administration—two months in advance of the first<br />
conversion of employees into DCIPS—some components were unwilling to publish local<br />
implementing polices based on “interim final” regulations. In addition, two months is<br />
insufficient time for employees to be informed of and trained on the policies and procedures.<br />
Further, several important DCIPS policies and procedures have not yet been completed, as noted<br />
in Chapter 3.<br />
Implementing DCIPS while simultaneously developing and finalizing its policies and processes<br />
has had widespread negative effects. The lack of firm policy and guidance has impacted<br />
communications, training, and automated tools. Data from the Academy focus groups, online<br />
dialogue, and open forums indicate that communications and training have included inconsistent<br />
and contradictory information, and trainers have been unable to provide complete answers to<br />
even basic questions.<br />
138 OPM Framework, p. 27.<br />
79