02.01.2015 Views

Report - Government Executive

Report - Government Executive

Report - Government Executive

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

3. Implementing DCIPS;<br />

4. Evaluating the Success of DCIPS; and<br />

5. Life-Cycle Support.<br />

The program plan does not provide sufficient detail or milestones; it refers to an “established<br />

timeline” but does not include it. Further, its focus is on tactical strategies; references to change<br />

management issues are vague and few in number.<br />

In addition, the program plan was not followed. DCIPS policies and processes were to have<br />

been developed in the first phase of implementation. In reality, the timelines for Phases 1<br />

through 3 were compressed and overlapping, and key policies were not ready at the outset.<br />

Finding 4-11<br />

The Program Plan for DCIPS Implementation does not focus sufficiently on change management<br />

and lacks milestones for measuring progress.<br />

HR Business Processes and Procedures<br />

According to the OPM framework, business processes and procedures related to an alternative<br />

personnel system should be documented prior to implementation. 138 These processes and<br />

procedures provide the foundation for the development of automated tools, training materials,<br />

and other implementation activities.<br />

A major flaw of DCIPS’ implementation is that components were transitioned to DCIPS before<br />

processes, procedures, and roles and responsibilities were finalized. For example, the DoD<br />

policies, procedures, and responsibilities regarding performance management and for the DCIPS<br />

occupational structure were not finalized until August 2009—two years after implementation<br />

began. Although interim final regulations were signed in July 2008 for performance<br />

management, occupational structure, and pay administration—two months in advance of the first<br />

conversion of employees into DCIPS—some components were unwilling to publish local<br />

implementing polices based on “interim final” regulations. In addition, two months is<br />

insufficient time for employees to be informed of and trained on the policies and procedures.<br />

Further, several important DCIPS policies and procedures have not yet been completed, as noted<br />

in Chapter 3.<br />

Implementing DCIPS while simultaneously developing and finalizing its policies and processes<br />

has had widespread negative effects. The lack of firm policy and guidance has impacted<br />

communications, training, and automated tools. Data from the Academy focus groups, online<br />

dialogue, and open forums indicate that communications and training have included inconsistent<br />

and contradictory information, and trainers have been unable to provide complete answers to<br />

even basic questions.<br />

138 OPM Framework, p. 27.<br />

79

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!