Report - Government Executive
Report - Government Executive
Report - Government Executive
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Inclusion<br />
Identifying groups and their concerns is a key first step to involve stakeholders. A centralized<br />
assessment that solicits and consolidates component stakeholder input would be expected to<br />
provide useful information about:<br />
• Individual organizational cultures;<br />
• Organizational structures and work processes;<br />
• Idiosyncrasies of component workforces; and<br />
• Other conditions that might factor into DCIPS design features and approaches to specific<br />
implementation activities.<br />
OUSD(I)’s outreach efforts did not account for many important features of component readiness.<br />
Specifically, first-line supervisors are key stakeholders who face significant changes to their job<br />
due to DCIPS. There is no indication that their needs, impact, and training requirements were<br />
assessed sufficiently prior to system implementation.<br />
The intelligence components reported on their readiness to OUSD(I), but these reports focused<br />
on such items as trainings completed. They did not address the elements identified above or<br />
other important aspects of readiness, such as the workforce’s understanding of the system or the<br />
ability of supervisors and managers to assume the additional responsibilities required for<br />
successful implementation.<br />
Federal agencies with successfully implemented performance management systems provide<br />
useful examples of stakeholder involvement. For one, researchers who studied NGA’s adoption<br />
of performance-based compensation credit early and ongoing stakeholder involvement with<br />
creating employee acceptance of the program. 133 To inform the design of the NGA system, the<br />
agency sponsored focus groups to assess employee concerns and needs. In addition, 20<br />
employees from across the agency formed a steering group and were responsible for developing<br />
recommendations.<br />
Following development of the design framework, 100 NGA employees organized into eight<br />
teams to develop new HR practices. They provided input on pay bands, performance<br />
management, career development, pay pool administration, and other system design aspects.<br />
Aggressive employee outreach and ongoing solicitation of feedback helped generate support for<br />
the transition, created champions who were sources of reliable information, and helped identify<br />
special circumstances and issues that could otherwise have impacted implementation<br />
negatively. 134<br />
The following examples provide additional best practices for stakeholder involvement:<br />
133 Risher, Howard and Smallwood, Andrew, “Performance-Based Pay at NGA,” The Public Manager, Summer<br />
2009, pp. 25-26.<br />
134 Ibid, pp. 26-27.<br />
76