02.01.2015 Views

Report - Government Executive

Report - Government Executive

Report - Government Executive

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Inclusion<br />

Identifying groups and their concerns is a key first step to involve stakeholders. A centralized<br />

assessment that solicits and consolidates component stakeholder input would be expected to<br />

provide useful information about:<br />

• Individual organizational cultures;<br />

• Organizational structures and work processes;<br />

• Idiosyncrasies of component workforces; and<br />

• Other conditions that might factor into DCIPS design features and approaches to specific<br />

implementation activities.<br />

OUSD(I)’s outreach efforts did not account for many important features of component readiness.<br />

Specifically, first-line supervisors are key stakeholders who face significant changes to their job<br />

due to DCIPS. There is no indication that their needs, impact, and training requirements were<br />

assessed sufficiently prior to system implementation.<br />

The intelligence components reported on their readiness to OUSD(I), but these reports focused<br />

on such items as trainings completed. They did not address the elements identified above or<br />

other important aspects of readiness, such as the workforce’s understanding of the system or the<br />

ability of supervisors and managers to assume the additional responsibilities required for<br />

successful implementation.<br />

Federal agencies with successfully implemented performance management systems provide<br />

useful examples of stakeholder involvement. For one, researchers who studied NGA’s adoption<br />

of performance-based compensation credit early and ongoing stakeholder involvement with<br />

creating employee acceptance of the program. 133 To inform the design of the NGA system, the<br />

agency sponsored focus groups to assess employee concerns and needs. In addition, 20<br />

employees from across the agency formed a steering group and were responsible for developing<br />

recommendations.<br />

Following development of the design framework, 100 NGA employees organized into eight<br />

teams to develop new HR practices. They provided input on pay bands, performance<br />

management, career development, pay pool administration, and other system design aspects.<br />

Aggressive employee outreach and ongoing solicitation of feedback helped generate support for<br />

the transition, created champions who were sources of reliable information, and helped identify<br />

special circumstances and issues that could otherwise have impacted implementation<br />

negatively. 134<br />

The following examples provide additional best practices for stakeholder involvement:<br />

133 Risher, Howard and Smallwood, Andrew, “Performance-Based Pay at NGA,” The Public Manager, Summer<br />

2009, pp. 25-26.<br />

134 Ibid, pp. 26-27.<br />

76

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!