02.01.2015 Views

Report - Government Executive

Report - Government Executive

Report - Government Executive

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

FOREWORD<br />

The terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001 brought the missions and roles of the United States<br />

intelligence community into the public consciousness in ways previously unseen. Subsequent<br />

successful and unsuccessful attempts around the world, including the 2009 Christmas Day and<br />

the recent New York Times Square bombing attempts, have continued to demonstrate the<br />

importance of high-performing intelligence personnel in protecting and strengthening our<br />

nation’s security.<br />

At the core of the intelligence apparatus are dedicated men and women entrusted with the most<br />

important and sensitive missions related to the national security of the United States. They<br />

include the civilian employees of the U.S. Department of Defense’s (DoD) intelligence<br />

components—50,000 strong—who work tirelessly in the public interest at the National Security<br />

Agency, Defense Intelligence Agency, National Geospatial Intelligence Agency, Defense<br />

Security Service, National Reconnaissance Office, and the intelligence elements of the Army,<br />

Navy, Air Force, and Marine Corps.<br />

These public servants work to achieve missions that are more critical than ever: defending our<br />

nation and thwarting attack. The Academy Panel recognized that the manner in which the<br />

performance of these employees is assessed and rewarded is as important to how—and how well<br />

—they do their work, as it is to recruitment and retention. A culture that encourages “connecting<br />

the dots” and finding new ways to look at “dots” cannot be built on a system that rewards<br />

longevity over performance. The Panel concluded that a performance-based pay system that<br />

provides recognition for individual as well as collaborative performance can produce more<br />

robust discussion and better intelligence products that will significantly strengthen our ability to<br />

thwart attacks.<br />

For the past four years, DoD has engaged in the design and implementation of the Defense<br />

Civilian Intelligence Personnel System (DCIPS), which is intended to unify the DoD intelligence<br />

components under a single human resources management system. DCIPS represents<br />

transformational cultural change that requires paying as much attention to the system’s<br />

implementation as to its design. The National Academy Panel recognized the soundness of<br />

DCIPS’ design, the urgency of the effort, as well as the need to make certain changes in its<br />

planned implementation prior to moving forward. This report provides key recommendations<br />

aimed at encouraging greater collaboration among the intelligence components, restoring and<br />

building employee trust in DCIPS and, most importantly, strengthening personal accountability<br />

in the performance of agency missions. The stakes have never been higher. And, our<br />

intelligence personnel deserve nothing less.<br />

The National Academy was pleased to conduct this review for Congress and the Secretary of<br />

Defense. I want to thank the Academy Panel for its excellent and diligent work and the study<br />

team for its significant contributions. In addition, I wish to acknowledge the vital assistance<br />

provided by the Undersecretary of Defense for Intelligence and his staff, as well as the DoD<br />

intelligence components and the Office of the Director of National Intelligence. Finally, my<br />

appreciation goes to those personnel who provided access to critical information and contributed<br />

iii

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!