Report - Government Executive
Report - Government Executive
Report - Government Executive
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
CHAPTER 2<br />
THE HISTORICAL CONTEXT FOR A PERFORMANCE-BASED<br />
COMPENSATION SYSTEM IN THE DOD INTELLIGENGE<br />
COMPONENTS<br />
INTRODUCTION<br />
The terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001 introduced fundamental changes to the IC, including<br />
pressure to change the way its agencies manage their human resources. Studies conducted in the<br />
wake of the attacks noted that U.S. intelligence agencies missed or misinterpreted signals<br />
pointing to a major terrorist attack and that they failed to “connect the dots” linking the actions<br />
of the 9/11 terrorists to the plot.<br />
The consensus emerging from these studies was that the historical challenge for IC agencies,<br />
both civilian and military—to share information and work collaboratively—contributed<br />
significantly to this failure. The studies suggested that closer working relationships among the<br />
agencies would strengthen national intelligence operations and, by extension, assist in protecting<br />
national security. The studies also concluded that a common human capital framework was an<br />
important mechanism for bringing about closer IC working relationships and collaboration. 7<br />
During the same period, performance-based compensation systems were being introduced in the<br />
federal government as a replacement for the decades-old GS pay system. Advocates view these<br />
systems, widely used in the private sector, as an important tool for driving change. The premise<br />
is that rewarding employees with salary increases and bonus payments for results, rather than for<br />
longevity on the job, improves organizational results. As former OPM Director Linda Springer<br />
noted in 2005, the federal government “is not doing anything that’s new, that hasn’t been done<br />
by millions and millions of people for decades” by adopting performance-based compensation. 8<br />
The intersection of these two forces—the need to strengthen collaboration among intelligence<br />
agencies and increased use of performance-based compensation systems—coupled with ODNI<br />
efforts to respond to Congressional direction to adopt a common human resources framework,<br />
laid the foundation for DCIPS. The effort to implement it across the DoD intelligence<br />
components began in 2008 and 2009.<br />
THE EVOLUTION OF DCIPS<br />
The Secretary of Defense was given authority to establish common personnel policies for<br />
Department of Defense (DoD) intelligence components in 1996. 9 In 1997, the Office of the<br />
Undersecretary of Defense for Personnel and Readiness (OUSD (P&R)) and the Assistant<br />
7 <strong>Report</strong> of the National Commission on Terrorist Attacks Upon the United States (9/11 Commission), 2004, p. 414<br />
8 <strong>Government</strong> <strong>Executive</strong>. Aug. 4, 2005. http://www.govexec.com/story_page.cfmarticleid=31908<br />
9 Public Law 104-201. National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1997.<br />
7