02.01.2015 Views

Report - Government Executive

Report - Government Executive

Report - Government Executive

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

CHAPTER 2<br />

THE HISTORICAL CONTEXT FOR A PERFORMANCE-BASED<br />

COMPENSATION SYSTEM IN THE DOD INTELLIGENGE<br />

COMPONENTS<br />

INTRODUCTION<br />

The terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001 introduced fundamental changes to the IC, including<br />

pressure to change the way its agencies manage their human resources. Studies conducted in the<br />

wake of the attacks noted that U.S. intelligence agencies missed or misinterpreted signals<br />

pointing to a major terrorist attack and that they failed to “connect the dots” linking the actions<br />

of the 9/11 terrorists to the plot.<br />

The consensus emerging from these studies was that the historical challenge for IC agencies,<br />

both civilian and military—to share information and work collaboratively—contributed<br />

significantly to this failure. The studies suggested that closer working relationships among the<br />

agencies would strengthen national intelligence operations and, by extension, assist in protecting<br />

national security. The studies also concluded that a common human capital framework was an<br />

important mechanism for bringing about closer IC working relationships and collaboration. 7<br />

During the same period, performance-based compensation systems were being introduced in the<br />

federal government as a replacement for the decades-old GS pay system. Advocates view these<br />

systems, widely used in the private sector, as an important tool for driving change. The premise<br />

is that rewarding employees with salary increases and bonus payments for results, rather than for<br />

longevity on the job, improves organizational results. As former OPM Director Linda Springer<br />

noted in 2005, the federal government “is not doing anything that’s new, that hasn’t been done<br />

by millions and millions of people for decades” by adopting performance-based compensation. 8<br />

The intersection of these two forces—the need to strengthen collaboration among intelligence<br />

agencies and increased use of performance-based compensation systems—coupled with ODNI<br />

efforts to respond to Congressional direction to adopt a common human resources framework,<br />

laid the foundation for DCIPS. The effort to implement it across the DoD intelligence<br />

components began in 2008 and 2009.<br />

THE EVOLUTION OF DCIPS<br />

The Secretary of Defense was given authority to establish common personnel policies for<br />

Department of Defense (DoD) intelligence components in 1996. 9 In 1997, the Office of the<br />

Undersecretary of Defense for Personnel and Readiness (OUSD (P&R)) and the Assistant<br />

7 <strong>Report</strong> of the National Commission on Terrorist Attacks Upon the United States (9/11 Commission), 2004, p. 414<br />

8 <strong>Government</strong> <strong>Executive</strong>. Aug. 4, 2005. http://www.govexec.com/story_page.cfmarticleid=31908<br />

9 Public Law 104-201. National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1997.<br />

7

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!