Report - Government Executive
Report - Government Executive
Report - Government Executive
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
assessment strategies and provides a mechanism for participant feedback or course evaluation.<br />
Registration and record-keeping should be seamless with training available on a just-in-time<br />
basis, especially for skills training. 127 Given the size, geographic dispersion, and complexity of<br />
the DCIPS population, training also should be offered through various media, including<br />
websites, electronic job aids, and reference guides.<br />
As noted previously, many courses offered to the DoD intelligence workforce have focused on<br />
knowledge and skills associated with using DCIPS. Given that DCIPS policy and guidance were<br />
not stable at the outset, the training content often changed to accommodate changes in policy and<br />
updates to automated tools. This added both expense and workforce frustration.<br />
The DCIPS training evaluation focuses on measuring participant satisfaction with individual<br />
training sessions and counting the number of participants trained monthly. These are common<br />
measures, but they do not assess the more important aspects of content validity (was the content<br />
correct and thorough), or application to the job (were they able to use what they learned).<br />
Recent DCIPS survey questions asked whether training equipped employees with the skills<br />
needed for implementation. 128 Preliminary results suggest that more work is needed to train<br />
employees adequately in writing SMART objectives and communicating how DCIPS will affect<br />
them. Aside from NGA, fewer than half of the respondents from the intelligence components<br />
agreed or strongly agreed that they were satisfied with their training. At NGA, 52 percent agreed<br />
or strongly agreed. 129<br />
The ratings of satisfaction or “helpfulness” regarding specific aspects of the training (delivery<br />
method or specific topics covered) appear to be consistently lower; less than half of the<br />
respondents from all or most components gave favorable ratings to specific training questions.<br />
These findings suggest aspects that OUSD(I) may consider for improvement. 130<br />
Many employees, especially those in remote locations, noted technical challenges. Access to<br />
high speed Internet access is not universal among DCIPS employees, so web-based training is<br />
not effectively delivered to them. Further, representatives of the military services noted that they<br />
must retrain their uniformed managers more frequently as they experience turnover<br />
approximately every two years. This impacts the long-term management of DCIPS, as well as<br />
the ability to refresh leaders and maintain a consistent level of knowledge and proficiency among<br />
the uniformed supervisor cadre.<br />
Academy-sponsored discussions generated mixed employee reactions to training. The biggest<br />
sources of frustration stemmed from the system’s immaturity and tools. As policy changed, the<br />
training received became obsolete. Sometimes, trainers were unable to provide correct answers<br />
because the content was unstable. Still other employees complained that they had been unable to<br />
attend training because not enough courses were offered. Meanwhile, some managers found the<br />
127 Skills training should be conducted just prior to its subsequent application on the job—no more than two weeks<br />
before the application of the new skills—to maximize retention.<br />
128 2010 DCIPS Survey Preliminary Results, Question 36.<br />
129 Ibid.<br />
130 Ibid.<br />
74