The Health bulletin [serial] - University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
The Health bulletin [serial] - University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
The Health bulletin [serial] - University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
:<br />
8 <strong>The</strong> <strong>Health</strong> Bulletin March, liJii'i<br />
cduc<strong>at</strong>ldii, and few <strong>of</strong> the othtM- di'partlUL'Uts<br />
<strong>of</strong> au institution can point to<br />
such expensive adjuncts to their teachiKK<br />
fai'ilities.<br />
When the department <strong>of</strong><br />
heiilth and hyi^'iene is accorded equal<br />
budfiet recoj,'nilion with the department<br />
<strong>of</strong> <strong>at</strong>hletics in our schools and colleges<br />
a gre<strong>at</strong> advance in health betterment<br />
may be expected. Tlie suggested change<br />
waits largely upon the time when educ<strong>at</strong>ional<br />
directors will interpret their responsibilities<br />
in terms <strong>of</strong> healthy men<br />
and women gradu<strong>at</strong>es r<strong>at</strong>her than in<br />
championship games and g<strong>at</strong>e receipts.<br />
<strong>The</strong> above discussion is not to be<br />
considered as an <strong>at</strong>tack on organized<br />
school <strong>at</strong>hletics which should find a<br />
n<strong>at</strong>ural expression in interclass and<br />
intercollegi<strong>at</strong>e games. It is useful, however,<br />
to suggest comparisons between<br />
trends in departments <strong>of</strong> our educ<strong>at</strong>ional<br />
institutions in order to give<br />
proper emphasis to the work <strong>of</strong> each.—<br />
<strong>The</strong> X<strong>at</strong> ion's <strong>Health</strong>.<br />
A CASE OF SMALLPOX NOW INEXCUSABLE<br />
It does seem th<strong>at</strong> in a moder<strong>at</strong>ely<br />
intelligent and civilized st<strong>at</strong>e as <strong>North</strong><br />
<strong>Carolina</strong> ought to be, th<strong>at</strong> it would no<br />
longer be necessary to urge upon the<br />
people the necessity for vaccin<strong>at</strong>ion to<br />
prevent such a dangerous and lo<strong>at</strong>hsome<br />
disease as smallpox. A recent vaccin<strong>at</strong>ion<br />
is almost a sure preventive.<br />
It is clean. It is safe. It produces<br />
only one small scar. It assures one who<br />
is protected through vaccin<strong>at</strong>ion th<strong>at</strong><br />
he cannot possibly become a menace to<br />
other people. It has the evidence <strong>of</strong> one<br />
hundred and twenty-five years successful<br />
use to recommend it. In all these<br />
one hundred and twenty-five years use<br />
<strong>of</strong> vaccin<strong>at</strong>ion in all countries <strong>of</strong> the<br />
world, not more than one lost arm or<br />
life in a million reported as accidents<br />
following vaccin<strong>at</strong>ion have ever been<br />
proved to be true. Not more than onetenth<br />
as many de<strong>at</strong>hs have ever been<br />
caused by smallpox vaccin<strong>at</strong>ion as from<br />
scr<strong>at</strong>ches incident to the use <strong>of</strong> common<br />
pins in wearing apparel. Notwithstanding<br />
all the proved scientific safety and<br />
cleanliness <strong>of</strong> modern vaccin<strong>at</strong>ion a few<br />
loud mouthed <strong>of</strong>ficial minders <strong>of</strong> other<br />
peoples business are always able to<br />
keep a few timid souls from availing<br />
tliemselves <strong>of</strong> the protection vaccin<strong>at</strong>ion<br />
afCords.<br />
A case <strong>of</strong> smallpox was recently reported<br />
in one <strong>of</strong> the St<strong>at</strong>e's oldest and<br />
most famous boarding schools. This<br />
fact leads us to repe<strong>at</strong> one more time<br />
th<strong>at</strong> it is now practically inexcusable<br />
for a case <strong>of</strong> smallpox to occur in any<br />
boarding school or educ<strong>at</strong>ional institution<br />
<strong>of</strong> any kind, or in any charitable<br />
or penal institution. <strong>The</strong> first duty<br />
<strong>of</strong> the authorities <strong>of</strong> all such institutions<br />
is to protect the health <strong>of</strong> their<br />
proteges. <strong>The</strong>y should demand protection<br />
against smallpox, typhoid fever<br />
and diphtheria as the very first requisite<br />
for admittance. <strong>The</strong>se requirements<br />
are reasonable and easy to secure ; and<br />
the requirement can be st<strong>at</strong>ed in the<br />
printed requirements for entrance, and<br />
should be rigidly enforced.<br />
If any fool anti <strong>of</strong> wh<strong>at</strong>ever strii>e<br />
wants to raise objection let him do so<br />
on the outside where his ignorance cannot<br />
so seriously menace the health <strong>of</strong><br />
others. Every instituti(m has the full<br />
constitutional right to prescribe the<br />
rules and regul<strong>at</strong>ions necessary to safeguard<br />
the health <strong>of</strong> its students or inm<strong>at</strong>es<br />
and this right should be scrupulously<br />
exercised.<br />
During the year 1925 there were one<br />
thousand nine hundred and twenty<br />
cases <strong>of</strong> smallpox reported to the <strong>North</strong><br />
<strong>Carolina</strong> St<strong>at</strong>e Board <strong>of</strong> <strong>Health</strong>. During<br />
the year 1926 there were one thousand<br />
five hundred and ninety-four cases<br />
reported. During the year 1926 the<br />
St<strong>at</strong>e Board <strong>of</strong> <strong>Health</strong> wrote every<br />
physician in <strong>North</strong> <strong>Carolina</strong> who had<br />
recently reported a case <strong>of</strong> smallpox<br />
either in the l<strong>at</strong>ter part <strong>of</strong> the year<br />
1925 or any time during 1926 asking the<br />
physician reporting it to answer the<br />
following question<br />
"We are endeavoring to ascertain<br />
wh<strong>at</strong> per cent <strong>of</strong> those having smallpox<br />
were previously vaccin<strong>at</strong>ed, also the<br />
year <strong>of</strong> vaccin<strong>at</strong>ion. We notice th<strong>at</strong> you<br />
reported the case or cases named below<br />
as having smallpox. Will you please<br />
fill in space opposite the name as to<br />
whether or not they had been vaccin<strong>at</strong>ed<br />
and return to this <strong>of</strong>fice."<br />
In response to this request to the<br />
physicians who had reported these<br />
cases, living in almost every section <strong>of</strong><br />
<strong>North</strong> <strong>Carolina</strong>, we received replies