08.01.2015 Views

State of World Population 2012 - Country Page List - UNFPA

State of World Population 2012 - Country Page List - UNFPA

State of World Population 2012 - Country Page List - UNFPA

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

ates, lowest fertility rates, lowest maternal mortality<br />

rates and some <strong>of</strong> the best maternal and<br />

child health indicators in the world (Seneviratne<br />

and Rajapaksa, 2000).<br />

Some <strong>of</strong> the most rigorous evidence <strong>of</strong> the<br />

effect <strong>of</strong> fertility decline on improvements in<br />

women’s health comes from Matlab, Bangladesh,<br />

where a long-term maternal and child-health<br />

programme provided doorstep-delivery <strong>of</strong><br />

contraceptives, pre-natal care, vaccinations, safedelivery<br />

kits and a variety <strong>of</strong> other health services<br />

to women in their homes. Over the course <strong>of</strong> 30<br />

years, the programme not only reduced fertility<br />

by about 15 per cent and improved maternal<br />

and child mortality rates, but also had a variety<br />

<strong>of</strong> spillover effects on women’s health. Women<br />

who were exposed to the programme throughout<br />

their reproductive lives experienced increases in<br />

their weight, body mass and general health status<br />

(Phillips et al., 1988; Muhuri and Preston, 1991;<br />

Muhuri, 1995; Muhuri, 1996; Ronsmans and<br />

Khlat, 1999; Chowdhury et al., 2007). Studies<br />

found that the body-mass index <strong>of</strong> women<br />

who participated in the programme crossed a<br />

threshold <strong>of</strong> 18.5, which is associated with lower<br />

mortality risks (<strong>World</strong> Health Organization,<br />

1995). A recent study argues that a one-point<br />

increase in body mass index around this value <strong>of</strong><br />

18.5 lowers the hazard <strong>of</strong> death by 17 per cent<br />

(Joshi and Schultz, 2007).<br />

Linkages between reproductive health and economic outcomes<br />

WOMEN<br />

Fewer Births<br />

Fewer Risky<br />

Births<br />

Lower Risks<br />

<strong>of</strong> Mortality<br />

Reproductive<br />

health<br />

services<br />

Healthy<br />

Pregnancy<br />

Safe<br />

Delivery<br />

CHILDREN<br />

Improved<br />

Overall<br />

Health<br />

Increased<br />

Life<br />

Expectancy<br />

Increased<br />

Productivity<br />

HOUSEHOLD<br />

Increased<br />

Schooling<br />

Increased<br />

Income<br />

Improved Foetal<br />

Health<br />

Improved<br />

Childhood<br />

Health<br />

Fewer<br />

Childhood<br />

Infections<br />

Vaccinations<br />

Lower Risks<br />

<strong>of</strong> Mortality<br />

Improved<br />

Cognition<br />

Lower Risks<br />

<strong>of</strong> Life-time<br />

Illness<br />

Lower<br />

Dependency<br />

Ratio<br />

Increased<br />

Labour Force<br />

Participation<br />

72 CHAPTER 4: THE SOCIAL AND ECONOMIC IMPACT OF FAMILY PLANNING

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!