08.01.2015 Views

State of World Population 2012 - Country Page List - UNFPA

State of World Population 2012 - Country Page List - UNFPA

State of World Population 2012 - Country Page List - UNFPA

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>State</strong>s in 1960. The pill afforded American<br />

women unprecedented freedom to make simultaneous<br />

decisions about childbearing as well as<br />

their careers. A causal analysis <strong>of</strong> the impact <strong>of</strong><br />

the pill on the timing <strong>of</strong> first births and women’s<br />

labour force participation suggests that legal<br />

access to the pill before age 21 significantly<br />

reduced the likelihood <strong>of</strong> a first birth before age<br />

22, increased the number <strong>of</strong> women in the paid<br />

labour force, and raised the number <strong>of</strong> annual<br />

hours worked. The effects are significant: from<br />

1970 to 1990 early access to the pill accounted<br />

for three <strong>of</strong> the 20 percentage-point increase (14<br />

per cent) in labour force participation rates and<br />

67 <strong>of</strong> the 450 increase in annual hours worked<br />

(15 per cent) among women between the ages<br />

<strong>of</strong> 16 and 30 (Bailey, 2006).<br />

Access to family planning services also affects<br />

labour market participation through the reduction<br />

<strong>of</strong> morbidity and improvement in overall<br />

health. Family planning contributes to the<br />

reduction <strong>of</strong> risky and complicated births, and<br />

this reduces the risk <strong>of</strong> maternal morbidity and<br />

increases women’s productivity.<br />

There are some exceptions to these patterns.<br />

In some contexts, female labour force participation<br />

can decrease as fertility declines or as<br />

educational attainment and socioeconomic status<br />

increase. In the Matlab project in Bangladesh,<br />

for example, the provision <strong>of</strong> family planning<br />

and reproductive health services to adult women<br />

in their homes for a period <strong>of</strong> 20 years resulted<br />

in significant improvements in well-being,<br />

but female participation in wage employment<br />

actually declined. Researchers attribute this<br />

phenomenon to strong patriarchal mores and<br />

restrictions on female mobility, particularly for<br />

wealthy and high-status women, causing some<br />

women to work at home instead <strong>of</strong> performing<br />

manual or wage labour outside the home.<br />

Estimates indicated, however, that women<br />

who did work in paid jobs received wages that<br />

were more than one-third higher than their<br />

counterparts who had not received programme<br />

services. These wage gains were largely driven by<br />

the higher returns women received from their<br />

schooling in villages covered by the programme<br />

(Schultz, 2009a).<br />

Health and income benefits from family<br />

planning also bolster women’s rights<br />

Declines in fertility, improvements in health and<br />

increased incomes can improve women’s rights<br />

at home and in their communities. A recent<br />

study illustrates that when fertility declines<br />

and the importance <strong>of</strong> human capital in the<br />

economy increases, men start to be willing to<br />

share power with women to ensure that children<br />

get better educated, since women invest more<br />

in children’s human capital and their bargaining<br />

power matters for household decisions (Doepke<br />

and Tertlit, 2009). Men face a trade<strong>of</strong>f between<br />

their own utility and the utility <strong>of</strong> their children,<br />

grandchildren, and future generations. This tilts<br />

their preferences towards ceding women greater<br />

rights. The evidence for this argument is historical:<br />

using parliamentary debates and newspaper<br />

editorials, the authors document that in both<br />

England and the United <strong>State</strong>s there was a<br />

gradual shift during the nineteenth century from<br />

arguments that concentrated on the rights <strong>of</strong><br />

men towards a view that gave first priority to<br />

the needs <strong>of</strong> children.<br />

Family planning and the well-being<br />

<strong>of</strong> children<br />

Improved reproductive health services influence<br />

child health in several ways. First, the use <strong>of</strong><br />

family planning services to achieve a reduction<br />

in the number <strong>of</strong> pregnancies and the better<br />

spacing <strong>of</strong> births create positive spillovers<br />

because healthier women give birth to healthier<br />

76 CHAPTER 4: THE SOCIAL AND ECONOMIC IMPACT OF FAMILY PLANNING

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!