Tracking External Donor Funding.pdf - NDC

More documents

Recommendations

Info

VII. Statistical Appendix 11 1. External Donor Aid Comparison of MAS and MoI data on PNGO Distribution (2001, 2006) Org MOI MAS Year 2001 2006 2000 2006 Comparison No. of % of No. of % of No. of % of No. of % of PNGOs WB PNGOs WB PNGOs WB PNGOs WB North WB 77 20.8 492 30.5 231 34.2 405 42.6 Central WB 205 55.4 704 43.4 232 34.4 267 28.1 South WB 88 23.8 423 26.1 212 31.4 279 29.3 All WB 370 100 1615 100 675 100 951 100 Source: Palestinian Ministry of Interior & MAS, 2007. Note: In MAS Studies, the West Bank accounts for 76.6% and 68.5% of all Palestinian NGOs in 2000 and 2006 respectively. Sources of Aid to PNGOs Types of Aid to PNGOs (2008) # of PNGOs surveyed receiving aid % of external aid to PNGOs External Aid 80 78.28% Self Funding 52 12.37% PA funding 20 0.83% local donations 41 5.31% donation from 1948 area 15 0.09% from outside Palestinian- Diaspora 25 2.32% Others 16 0.80% Total 100% Source: MAS, 2009 – PNGO Survey PNGO Sources of Revenue (1999, 2006 & 2008) Source/ Year 1999 2006 2008(*) External Aid 46.8% 60.9% 78.28% Self-generated Revenue 28.8% 21.5% 12.37% PA Funding 4.9% 0.7% 0.83% Local Donations 10.8% 9.3% 5.31% Donations from Palestinians living in Israel 1.4% 3.7% 0.09% Donations from the Diaspora 5.5% 3.2% 2.32% Others 1.8% 0.7% 0.80% Total 100% 100% 100% Sources: MAS, 2001, 2007 and 2009 – PNGO Survey *Note: The measurement of external aid dependency in 2008 is biased toward larger PNGOs. 11 Cells left blank equal zero or 0% 98
Externally Funded PNGO Activity by Type and Period Activity Type 1999-2000 2001-2005 2006-2008 Average Relief 34.3 37.6 29.1 32.7 Development 65.7 62.4 70.9 67.3 Total 100% 100% 100% 100% Source: MAS, 2009 – PNGO Survey PNGO Funding by Donor Groupings (1999 – 2008) Year EU USA Arab Other Countries Multilateral Institutions Total 1999 64.43% 12.41% 8.20% 4.25% 10.71% 100.00% 2000 62.42% 10.67% 4.46% 0.89% 21.56% 100.00% 2001 42.14% 6.89% 14.40% 2.40% 34.16% 100.00% 2002 49.33% 6.08% 16.96% 1.68% 25.95% 100.00% 2003 40.61% 7.66% 18.47% 4.25% 29.02% 100.00% 2004 58.06% 7.94% 13.51% 1.82% 18.66% 100.00% 2005 59.53% 5.40% 12.10% 5.25% 17.72% 100.00% 2006 62.10% 4.99% 9.13% 3.48% 20.30% 100.00% 2007 70.44% 3.39% 8.89% 3.30% 13.98% 100.00% 2008 67.78% 4.32% 10.70% 4.96% 12.23% 100.00% Source: MAS, 2009 – PNGO Survey Governmental versus Non Governmental Aid to PNGOs Year Governmental Nongovernmental Total 1999 52.09% 47.91% 100.00% 2000 61.14% 38.86% 100.00% 2001 59.9% 40.1% 100.00% 2002 38.0% 62.0% 100.00% 2003 42.3% 57.7% 100.00% 2004 44.9% 55.1% 100.00% 2005 41.7% 58.3% 100.00% 2006 41.1% 58.9% 100.00% 2007 48.2% 51.8% 100.00% 2008 44.8% 55.2% 100.00% Source: MAS, 2009 – PNGO Survey 99
Page 1 and 2:
Tracking External Donor Funding to
Page 3 and 4:
Foreword Palestinian Non-Government
Page 5:
Acknowledgements This publication a
Page 8 and 9:
3.10 The European Union Funding to
Page 10 and 11:
Acronyms AFESD - Arab Fund for Econ
Page 12 and 13:
Executive Summary Between 1999 and
Page 14 and 15:
Due to the fact that the donors sam
Page 16 and 17:
Year # of NGOs Returning data Table
Page 18 and 19:
institutions, we looked to the annu
Page 20 and 21:
Western support to the PNGO sector,
Page 22 and 23:
Strip. In the West Bank, President
Page 24 and 25:
Figure 3: Commitments versus Disbur
Page 26 and 27:
Figure 6: Percentage of the Externa
Page 28 and 29:
Table 6: Twenty Largest Donors to t
Page 30 and 31:
2.2.6.4 External Aid per capita in
Page 32 and 33:
Table 9: Sector Working Groups and
Page 34 and 35:
2.3.4 The Question of Ownership in
Page 36 and 37:
The Subsector Breakdown of the PRDP
Page 39 and 40:
3. Tracking of External Donor Fundi
Page 41 and 42:
3.1.2 External Aid to PNGOs as a Pe
Page 43 and 44:
Figure 15: Number of Registered NGO
Page 45 and 46:
Figure 17: Comparing the Percentage
Page 47 and 48:
Governmental Donors As discussed in
Page 49 and 50:
Table 14: Comparison of the Percent
Page 51 and 52:
3.6.4 Tracking External Aid to PNGO
Page 53 and 54:
Enhancing Democracy Funding to Enha
Page 55 and 56:
3.6.4.5 External Funding to Social
Page 57 and 58:
The following Figure 28 compares th
Page 59 and 60: As Figure 32 shows, donor governmen
Page 61 and 62: In the Central West Bank, Ramallah
Page 63 and 64: While the Figure 35 shows a relativ
Page 65 and 66: Figure 38: The Location of Internat
Page 67 and 68: 3.8.7 In Focus: PNGO Hierarchies Th
Page 69 and 70: The OPEC Fund for International Dev
Page 71 and 72: According to the survey, external f
Page 73: Figure 45: Palestinian Population D
Page 76 and 77: esearch could be fed back into the
Page 78 and 79: Challand, Benoit (2005). “Looking
Page 80 and 81: Ministry of Planning (2008). Aid Ef
Page 83: Appendices 71
Page 87 and 88: I. Political Timeline 1991 1993 199
Page 89 and 90: Nov - Annapolis peace conference De
Page 91 and 92: Figure 1: Geography of West Bank an
Page 93 and 94: International Non-Governmental Orga
Page 95 and 96: Does international aid help to supp
Page 97 and 98: Table 3: International Donor Worker
Page 99 and 100: IV. Review of Welfare Study (1998)
Page 101 and 102: c. The donor agenda does not necess
Page 103 and 104: Even when donors were cooperative,
Page 105 and 106: Governorate or 2008 1999 2000 2001
Page 107 and 108: Q7 Q8 Q9 Q10 Q11 Q12 Q13 Q14 Q15 Wh
Page 109: Q18 Percentage distribution of the
Page 113 and 114: International Governmental Aid to P
Page 115 and 116: External Aid and PNGO Activity by T
Page 117 and 118: International Nongovernmental Aid D
Page 119 and 120: International Aid Distribution by G
Page 121 and 122: International Governmental Aid Dist
Page 123 and 124: Distribution of PNGOs Based on Geog
Page 125: Distribution of PNGOs by Governorat
show all

Tracking External Donor Funding.pdf - NDC

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?