Tracking External Donor Funding.pdf - NDC
Tracking External Donor Funding.pdf - NDC
Tracking External Donor Funding.pdf - NDC
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
The OPEC Fund for International Development will<br />
provide $1.5 million between June 2009 and June 2010<br />
for ‘empowering the Palestinians live in Jerusalem’.<br />
However, this project is implemented in partnership<br />
between Al-Awqaf Islamic affairs department and a<br />
‘PNGO’ called Al Quds for Welfare and Development,<br />
who received $600,000 out of the $1.5 million granted.<br />
In spite of the few samples of Arab-PNGO partnerships<br />
outlined above, it looks like the funds provided through<br />
Al-Aqsa Fund are primarily directed at the Palestinian<br />
Authority. Arab funding to PNGOs is still limited and<br />
exclusive to certain area and priorities.<br />
3.9.2 PNGO Survey Results<br />
Though we are aware of the limitations of our survey of<br />
Arab funding, our PNGO survey has given us an<br />
interesting picture of the broad trends in Arab aid to<br />
PNGOs between 1999 and 2008. According to our<br />
survey, Arab funding decreases in the proportion of total<br />
aid to PNGOs almost throughout the 1990’s. Only with<br />
the onset of the Second Intifada and the decline in<br />
funding from the West. As the Intifada began to wind<br />
down in 2003, Western support returned, reducing the<br />
significance of Arab funding to the PNGO sector.<br />
Between 2006 and 2008, Arab aid has accounted for<br />
around 10% of the total.<br />
Figure 41: Arab <strong>Funding</strong> as a Percentage of Total <strong>External</strong><br />
Aid to PNGOs (1999 – 2008)<br />
20<br />
18<br />
16<br />
14<br />
12<br />
10<br />
8<br />
6<br />
4<br />
2<br />
0<br />
1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008<br />
Source: MAS, 2009 – PNGO Survey<br />
3.10 The European Union <strong>Funding</strong> to<br />
PNGOS<br />
The European Commission is a major benefactor to the<br />
PNGO sector. Unlike USAID, however, PNGOs<br />
accepting European money is not tabooed, and there are<br />
a number of programs through which local NGOs can<br />
apply for direct partnerships with the EC (eg. the<br />
European Partners for Peace Initiative). As most often<br />
occurs though, European money flows through a member<br />
states INGO before it reaches the local partner.<br />
The trend in EU funding from 2002 to 2008 to PNGOs<br />
could be characterized as a roller coaster. It nearly<br />
doubles between 2002 and 2003, before quadrupling the<br />
following the year. In 2005 the amount of funding<br />
decreased by a factor of four over 2004 and dropped<br />
again in 2006. In 2007 the EU reached over 3.5 Million<br />
Dollars in direct funding to PNGOs, and in 2008 the<br />
amount had grown to over 8.5%.<br />
In 2002, 2003 and 2006, the EC was heavily invested in<br />
Rural Development which comprised 72, 98, and 64%<br />
respectively. 2005 saw a big move into peace education<br />
and forums (67%), categorized here as Liberal Arts<br />
Education. 2006 ironically saw the greatest amount of<br />
funding to activities falling under Democratization. In<br />
2008, there is a wide variety of projects (27 in total). The<br />
majority of the funding however is captured by three<br />
main sectors: Health (primarily in the treatment and<br />
rehabilitation of torture victims), Human Rights and<br />
Women’s Affairs.<br />
The EU tends to focus on urban populations with its<br />
NGO funding, though rural populations also benefit.<br />
Their impact or targeting of refugees however remains<br />
relatively low – most likely due to their funding of<br />
UNRWA.<br />
57