09.01.2015 Views

Tracking External Donor Funding.pdf - NDC

Tracking External Donor Funding.pdf - NDC

Tracking External Donor Funding.pdf - NDC

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Figure 44: Percentage of <strong>External</strong>ly Funded PNGO<br />

Activities by Target Population and Period<br />

100%<br />

90%<br />

80%<br />

70%<br />

60%<br />

50%<br />

40%<br />

30%<br />

20%<br />

10%<br />

0%<br />

1999-2000 2001-2005 2006-2008<br />

Urban Rural Refugee All<br />

Source: MAS, 2009 – PNGO Survey<br />

Refugee target groups receive only a fraction of the total<br />

external aid to large PNGOs, with the highest percentage<br />

(11%) being in the second period.<br />

The high percentage of respondents choosing the ‘All<br />

Populations’ category is reflective of a sample weighted<br />

towards large PNGOs working at the national and seminational<br />

levels. We suspect however that the lower<br />

percentage of external funded PNGO activities targeting<br />

‘all populations’ in the third period, reflects the better<br />

record keeping of PNGOs in more recent years, allowing<br />

them to better allocate their activities by target<br />

population.<br />

3.11.3 Location of Large PNGO Project<br />

Implementation by Region and Period<br />

Our PNGO survey aimed to capture the changes in the<br />

geographic distribution of large PNGO project<br />

implementation on the regional level over the three<br />

periods of time, rather than the population of PNGOs as<br />

a whole. As the following table shows, there is a slight<br />

increase (12.4% to 14.8%) in large PNGO activity in the<br />

North WB during the second period, when the region<br />

underwent extreme economic and social destruction in<br />

Israel’s operation “Defensive Shield”. In the third period,<br />

the percentage returns to little over twelve, highlighting<br />

that within the West Bank, the north is the most under<br />

represented region in comparison to the population<br />

(24.3%).<br />

The Central WB sees a slight increase between the first<br />

and second periods, before declining again in the third<br />

period to around 11% of the total. As the Central WB<br />

constitutes 17.8% of the total Palestinian population, it<br />

could be viewed as under represented in terms of<br />

externally funded PNGO activities. However, we believe<br />

this to be untrue as a number of the organizations<br />

working at the All Palestine levels are located in the<br />

Central WB and carry out activities there, as well as the<br />

rest of the WB&GS.<br />

The distribution of externally funded PNGO activities in<br />

the South WB increases steadily over the three periods,<br />

from 14.8% to 18.9%. This is precisely the distribution<br />

of the population in the region.<br />

The Gaza Strip is home to 39% of the Palestinian<br />

population in the WB&GS and 29% of its activities. Like<br />

the other regions, the Gaza Strip does receive a portion<br />

of the aid designated as ‘All Palestine’.<br />

60

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!