09.01.2015 Views

Tracking External Donor Funding.pdf - NDC

Tracking External Donor Funding.pdf - NDC

Tracking External Donor Funding.pdf - NDC

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

2.2.6.4 <strong>External</strong> Aid per capita in the WB&GS<br />

Figure 10 shows the fluctuations in the amount of<br />

external aid to Palestinians in the WB&GS on a per<br />

capita basis. There is a dramatic rise beginning in 2000<br />

and culminating at the height of the 2002 Intifada, and a<br />

similar pattern emerging in between the 2006 elections<br />

and the 2007 advent of the Emergency Government.<br />

Between 2000 and 2002, and between 2006 and 2008,<br />

the level of external aid on a per capita basis more than<br />

doubles (219 to 518 and 405 to 848 respectively).<br />

Figure 10: <strong>External</strong> Aid Per Capita<br />

to the WB&GS (1999-2008)<br />

900<br />

848<br />

800<br />

700<br />

600<br />

500<br />

400<br />

300<br />

200<br />

100<br />

0<br />

518<br />

506<br />

405<br />

288<br />

301<br />

333 322<br />

183<br />

219<br />

1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008<br />

Source: Table drawn from OECD/DAC and World Bank Databases (2009) and the<br />

PCBS (2009). Figures are given in USD.<br />

2.3 <strong>External</strong> Aid Coordination Structure<br />

As a result of the almost unprecedented amount of aid<br />

being channeled to the WB&GS and the highly<br />

politicized conditions in which it is delivered, a complex<br />

structure governing external aid has developed. The<br />

following section briefly maps the structure and<br />

evolution of this system, as well as its influence on the<br />

direction of external aid system. As these bodies<br />

represent the macro-level decision makers and<br />

stakeholders in the Palestinian development process, how<br />

and what decisions they make have an effect on external<br />

funding to PNGOs, which are only a small part of the<br />

bigger picture of externally financed development.<br />

2.3.1 Capital Level Aid Coordination<br />

As figure 2.3.1 shows, the external aid coordination<br />

structure is divided into two levels, the capital and the<br />

local. At the capital level are the major donor bodies,<br />

represented by the Quartet, EU, US, Russia and the UN.<br />

These players liaise with the Ad-Hoc Liaison Committee<br />

(AHLC), a 12-member committee, established on the 1 st<br />

of October 1993 by the Multilateral Steering Group of<br />

the multilateral talks on Middle East peace in the context<br />

of the Washington Conference. The AHLC serves as the<br />

principal policy-level coordination mechanism for<br />

development assistance to the Palestinian people and<br />

seeks to promote dialogue between donors, the<br />

Palestinian Authority (PA) and the Government of Israel<br />

(GoI). The AHLC is chaired by Norway and cosponsored<br />

by the EU and US. Its members include<br />

Russia, the EU, Japan, Canada and Saudi Arabia, while<br />

the PA, Israel, Egypt, Jordan and Tunisia are associate<br />

members. The World Bank acts as the Secretariat of the<br />

body.<br />

According to Brynen (2000:3), the AHLC acts as a 'sort<br />

of political steering committee, responsible for the<br />

overall guidelines and policies of the aid process, with all<br />

decisions made by consensus.<br />

The Joint Liaison Committee (JLC) follows up on<br />

AHLC decisions and recommendations at the local level,<br />

in between meetings of the AHLC, which are usually<br />

held twice a year (spring and autumn). The JLC was<br />

originally created in 1995 to enhance ‘tripartite’<br />

cooperation with the understanding that implementation<br />

18

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!