Tracking External Donor Funding.pdf - NDC

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Figure 3: Commitments versus Disbursements of External Aid (1998 – 2008) Ministry of Planning 2008 2007 2006 2005 2004 2003 2002 2001 2000 1999 1605 1222 1288 1119 1235 737 776 927 1404 1026 1527 929 1228 549 973 482 692 2102 2773 3728 Commitment Disbursement Source(s): 1998 – 2004 – MoP, World Bank Staff calculations (MoP, 2005:5) 2005 – 2007 - MoP, 2008:9; 2008 – MoP PAMS database online (accessed July 1, 2009). Note: Figures are given in Thousands USD. Note: Data from prior to 2004 does not include UNRWA or Humanitarian Relief, only budget and development support. Figure 4: Commitments versus Disbursements of External Aid (1998 – 2008) World Bank/OECD 2008 2007 2006 2005 2004 2003 2002 2001 2000 1999 616 754 644 869 563 637 681 516 626 987 1116 954 1115 972 1470 1450 1616 1876 3250 3700 Commitment Disbursement Source: World Bank, OECD DAC Databases Note: 2008 figures are estimates. All figures are given in Thousands USD. 2.2.3 Type of Aid Much in the same way that the amount of aid fluctuates from year to year, the type of aid given varies as well. The following Figure 5 show the shifts between the three main types of aid entering the WB&GS (Emergency Relief, Development and Budget Support) over the last seven years. 12
The Second Intifada and the shift in donor funding is the most illustrative example of politics altering development plans in Palestine. According to the World Bank (2003), in 2000 the ratio of donors’ commitment to development aid and emergency assistance was 7:1 in favor of development. By 2002 it had shifted to 5:1 in favor of emergency assistance. The shift back towards development assistance during 2003 and the winding down of the worst of the Intifada is nearly as dramatic as the change in 2002 away from development. 2007 also represents a low point in development funding as most external donors refused to directly support the PA, and instead funded only those PA budget items covered by the TIM. As we have seen, the creation and acceptance of the PRDP in 2007 led to a shift from the TIM to the PEGASE in 2008. Under the new structure of aid delivery specifically designed to align with the PRDP, the percentage of funding to development increased even more rapidly than in the previous three years. Figure 5: Type of External Aid Disbursed to the WB&GS (2002 – 2008) 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 Budget Support Emergency Aid Development Assistance Source: Palestinian MoP PAMS Database 2006 Elections and External Funding to the WB&GS 'The political upheavals within Palestine between 2005 and 2007 resulted in shifts in the type of aid donors sought to give. Development aid was most harshly affected. It dropped from constituting just under a third of all disbursements in 2005 to less than 10% in 2007. Due to the Emergency Services Support Project (ESSP), the Temporary International Mechanism (TIM) and increased support from Arab countries, the percentage of budget support rose (from approximately 33%) in 2005 to nearly 70% of 2007 disbursements to the PA’ (MoP, 2008:10). Though the Figure 5 shows a decrease in emergency and development aid to the PA, during this time PNGOs received higher levels of external funds between 2005 and 2008, growing by over 100 Million USD. The two Figures 5 and 6 focused on the percentage of funding apportioned to the different aid types can be misleading if we forget to look at the changes in the amount of external aid entering the WB&GS. The dramatic growth in aid over the last few years means that a decline in the percentage aid captured by any category between years does not imply a decrease in the amount. The previous Figure 6 is charted below in amounts for the years 2005 to 2007. According in Figure 7, budget support grows throughout the three years, nearly doubling between 2006 and 2007. Emergency Relief increases slightly between 2005 and 2006, before decreasing to only 385.2 million USD in 2007. Development Aid decreases steadily throughout the three years from 313 million USD in 2005 to 128 in 2007. 13
Page 1 and 2: Tracking External Donor Funding to
Page 3 and 4: Foreword Palestinian Non-Government
Page 5: Acknowledgements This publication a
Page 8 and 9: 3.10 The European Union Funding to
Page 10 and 11: Acronyms AFESD - Arab Fund for Econ
Page 12 and 13: Executive Summary Between 1999 and
Page 14 and 15: Due to the fact that the donors sam
Page 16 and 17: Year # of NGOs Returning data Table
Page 18 and 19: institutions, we looked to the annu
Page 20 and 21: Western support to the PNGO sector,
Page 22 and 23: Strip. In the West Bank, President
Page 26 and 27: Figure 6: Percentage of the Externa
Page 28 and 29: Table 6: Twenty Largest Donors to t
Page 30 and 31: 2.2.6.4 External Aid per capita in
Page 32 and 33: Table 9: Sector Working Groups and
Page 34 and 35: 2.3.4 The Question of Ownership in
Page 36 and 37: The Subsector Breakdown of the PRDP
Page 39 and 40: 3. Tracking of External Donor Fundi
Page 41 and 42: 3.1.2 External Aid to PNGOs as a Pe
Page 43 and 44: Figure 15: Number of Registered NGO
Page 45 and 46: Figure 17: Comparing the Percentage
Page 47 and 48: Governmental Donors As discussed in
Page 49 and 50: Table 14: Comparison of the Percent
Page 51 and 52: 3.6.4 Tracking External Aid to PNGO
Page 53 and 54: Enhancing Democracy Funding to Enha
Page 55 and 56: 3.6.4.5 External Funding to Social
Page 57 and 58: The following Figure 28 compares th
Page 59 and 60: As Figure 32 shows, donor governmen
Page 61 and 62: In the Central West Bank, Ramallah
Page 63 and 64: While the Figure 35 shows a relativ
Page 65 and 66: Figure 38: The Location of Internat
Page 67 and 68: 3.8.7 In Focus: PNGO Hierarchies Th
Page 69 and 70: The OPEC Fund for International Dev
Page 71 and 72: According to the survey, external f
Page 73: Figure 45: Palestinian Population D
Page 76 and 77:
esearch could be fed back into the
Page 78 and 79:
Challand, Benoit (2005). “Looking
Page 80 and 81:
Ministry of Planning (2008). Aid Ef
Page 83:
Appendices 71
Page 87 and 88:
I. Political Timeline 1991 1993 199
Page 89 and 90:
Nov - Annapolis peace conference De
Page 91 and 92:
Figure 1: Geography of West Bank an
Page 93 and 94:
International Non-Governmental Orga
Page 95 and 96:
Does international aid help to supp
Page 97 and 98:
Table 3: International Donor Worker
Page 99 and 100:
IV. Review of Welfare Study (1998)
Page 101 and 102:
c. The donor agenda does not necess
Page 103 and 104:
Even when donors were cooperative,
Page 105 and 106:
Governorate or 2008 1999 2000 2001
Page 107 and 108:
Q7 Q8 Q9 Q10 Q11 Q12 Q13 Q14 Q15 Wh
Page 109 and 110:
Q18 Percentage distribution of the
Page 111 and 112:
Externally Funded PNGO Activity by
Page 113 and 114:
International Governmental Aid to P
Page 115 and 116:
External Aid and PNGO Activity by T
Page 117 and 118:
International Nongovernmental Aid D
Page 119 and 120:
International Aid Distribution by G
Page 121 and 122:
International Governmental Aid Dist
Page 123 and 124:
Distribution of PNGOs Based on Geog
Page 125:
Distribution of PNGOs by Governorat
show all

Tracking External Donor Funding.pdf - NDC

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?